# Description of Changes Adds an eslint rule to disallow importing any Tauri APIs outside the desktop folder to help hint to developers that they should be following the frontend architecture. While doing this, I also discovered that you can provide a custom message in the `no-restricted-imports` rule, which is nicer than the comments that I'd previously added to the eslint config file to explain why they weren't allowed: ```text /Users/jamesbrunton/Dev/spdf1/frontend/src/core/components/shared/config/configSections/GeneralSection.tsx 19:1 error 'src/core/contexts/PreferencesContext' import is restricted from being used by a pattern. Use @app/* imports instead of absolute src/ imports no-restricted-imports 20:1 error '../../../../../core/contexts/AppConfigContext' import is restricted from being used by a pattern. Use @app/* imports instead of relative imports no-restricted-imports 21:1 error '@tauri-apps/core' import is restricted from being used by a pattern. Tauri APIs are desktop-only. Review frontend/DeveloperGuide.md for structure advice no-restricted-imports ```
5.2 KiB
Frontend Developer Guide
This document is a guide to the main frontend architectural rules in Stirling-PDF.
Mode-Specific Code
There are several different builds of the frontend, each with their own mode-specific code.
The frontend uses TypeScript Path Aliases to ensure that only relevant code for the configured app version will be present in the build.
Refer to the various tsconfig.*.json files to see the specific path alias order.
The vast majority of the code is in the src/core folder, which is the open-source app.
Other builds, such as the desktop app, use src/core as the base layer, and then override various files to change behaviour.
If an import is from '@app/a/b', this will refer to src/core/a/b.ts in the core build of the app, but may refer to src/desktop/a/b.ts in the desktop app if that file exists.
It is important to try to minimise the amount of overridden code in the app. Often, just one function needs to behave differently in a specific mode. For example:
// core/file1.ts
function f1() { /* ... */ }
function f2() { /* ... */ } // Needs to be overridden in desktop
function f3() { /* ... */ }
In cases like this, instead of duplicating the entire file, create a new extension module for the core app and override that in the desktop app.
// core/file1.ts
import { f2 } from '@app/file1Extensions';
function f1() { /* ... */ }
function f3() { /* ... */ }
// core/file1Extensions.ts
export function f2() { /* ... */ } // Original core implementation
// desktop/file1Extensions.ts
export function f2() { /* ... */ } // Custom desktop implementation
Building with this pattern minimises the duplicated code in the system and greatly reduces the chances that changing the core app will break the desktop app.
Naming extension modules
Extension modules and the functions/hooks they export should be named after what they do, not which build overrides them. Core code must never reference build targets (desktop, saas, etc.) by name — it should simply call a generic extension point and remain unaware of which layer is providing the implementation.
// ✅ CORRECT - named after the behaviour, not the build
// core/useFrontendVersionInfo.ts
export function useFrontendVersionInfo() { /* stub */ }
// desktop/useFrontendVersionInfo.ts
export function useFrontendVersionInfo() { /* real Tauri implementation */ }
// ❌ WRONG - core code reveals knowledge of the desktop layer
// core/useDesktopVersionInfo.ts
export function useDesktopVersionInfo() { /* stub */ }
Similarly, core code should never contain conditionals that check which build is active (e.g. if (isDesktop)).
If behaviour needs to vary, that variation belongs in an extension module - the core simply calls it.
The same principle applies in reverse: code inside desktop/ is guaranteed to be running in the Tauri environment, so isTauri() checks are never needed there either.
If you find yourself writing if (isDesktop()) or if (isTauri()) anywhere, that is a sign the extension point has not been modelled correctly - the build system is already doing that separation for you.
List extensions
When a build needs to add behaviour rather than replace it, the extension module can return a list of items and let core manage the rendering. Core defines the function to return an empty list; the extension build overrides it to return a populated one.
// core/toolbarExtensions.ts
export interface ToolbarButton {
label: string;
onClick: () => void;
}
export function getToolbarButtons(): ToolbarButton[] {
return [];
}
// desktop/toolbarExtensions.ts
import { type ToolbarButton } from '@core/toolbarExtensions';
export { type ToolbarButton };
export function getToolbarButtons(): ToolbarButton[] {
return [
{ label: 'Open folder', onClick: () => { /* ... */ } },
];
}
// core/Toolbar.tsx
import { getToolbarButtons } from '@app/toolbarExtensions';
export function Toolbar() {
return (
<div>
<button onClick={() => { /* ... */ }}>Download</button>
<button onClick={() => { /* ... */ }}>Print</button>
{getToolbarButtons().map((button) => (
<button key={button.label} onClick={button.onClick}>
{button.label}
</button>
))}
</div>
);
}
This pattern works well for things like menu items or toolbar actions - anything where a build contributes additional entries to a well-defined set.
Import aliases
In general, all imports for app code should come via @app because it allows for other builds of the app to override behaviour if necessary.
The only time that it is beneficial to import via a specific folder (e.g. @core) is when you want to reduce duplication in the file you are overriding. For example:
// core/file2.ts
export interface MyProps {
// Lots of properties that we don't want to duplicate
}
export function f1(props: MyProps) { /* ... */ } // Original core implementation
// desktop/file2.ts
import { type MyProps } from '@core/file2';
export { type MyProps }; // Re-export so anything importing file2 can still access MyProps
export function f1(props: MyProps) { /* ... */ } // Custom desktop implementation