mirror of
https://github.com/juanfont/headscale.git
synced 2025-02-20 00:18:41 +01:00
remove policy handling for old capver
Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Dalby <kristoffer@tailscale.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c61fbe9c5f
commit
91868056f9
@ -541,27 +541,13 @@ func appendPeerChanges(
|
||||
resp.UserProfiles = profiles
|
||||
resp.SSHPolicy = sshPolicy
|
||||
|
||||
// 81: 2023-11-17: MapResponse.PacketFilters (incremental packet filter updates)
|
||||
if capVer >= 81 {
|
||||
// CapVer 81: 2023-11-17: MapResponse.PacketFilters (incremental packet filter updates)
|
||||
// Currently, we do not send incremental package filters, however using the
|
||||
// new PacketFilters field and "base" allows us to send a full update when we
|
||||
// have to send an empty list, avoiding the hack in the else block.
|
||||
resp.PacketFilters = map[string][]tailcfg.FilterRule{
|
||||
"base": policy.ReduceFilterRules(node, filter),
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// This is a hack to avoid sending an empty list of packet filters.
|
||||
// Since tailcfg.PacketFilter has omitempty, any empty PacketFilter will
|
||||
// be omitted, causing the client to consider it unchanged, keeping the
|
||||
// previous packet filter. Worst case, this can cause a node that previously
|
||||
// has access to a node to _not_ loose access if an empty (allow none) is sent.
|
||||
reduced := policy.ReduceFilterRules(node, filter)
|
||||
if len(reduced) > 0 {
|
||||
resp.PacketFilter = reduced
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
resp.PacketFilter = filter
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user