## About the changes
- Remove `idNumberMiddleware` method and change to use `parameters`
field in `openApiService.validPath` method for the flexibility.
- Remove unnecessary `Number` type converting method and change them to
use `<{id: number}>` to specify the type.
### Reference
The changed response looks like the one below.
```JSON
{
"id":"8174a692-7427-4d35-b7b9-6543b9d3db6e",
"name":"BadDataError",
"message":"Request validation failed: your request body or params contain invalid data. Refer to the `details` list for more information.",
"details":[
{
"message":"The `/params/id` property must be integer. You sent undefined.",
"path":"/params/id"
}
]
}
```
I think it might be better to customize the error response, especially
`"You sent undefined."`, on another pull request if this one is
accepted. I prefer to separate jobs to divide the context and believe
that it helps reviewer easier to understand.
Path types in our openapi are inferred as string (which is a sensible
default). But we can be more specific and provide the right type for
each parameter. This is one example of how we can do that
https://linear.app/unleash/issue/2-2518/figure-out-how-to-create-the-initial-admin-user-in-unleash
The logic around `initAdminUser` that was introduced in
https://github.com/Unleash/unleash/pull/4927 confused me a bit. I wrote
new tests with what I assume are our expectations for this feature and
refactored the code accordingly, but would like someone to confirm that
it makes sense to them as well.
The logic was split into 2 different methods: one to get the initial
invite link, and another to send a welcome email. Now these two methods
are more granular than the previous alternative and can be used
independently of creating a new user.
---------
Co-authored-by: Gastón Fournier <gaston@getunleash.io>
I've tried to use/add the audit info to all events I could see/find.
This makes this PR necessarily huge, because we do store quite a few
events.
I realise it might not be complete yet, but tests
run green, and I think we now have a pattern to follow for other events.
Previously, we were not validating that the ID was a number, which
sometimes resulted in returning our database queries (source code) to
the frontend. Now, we have validation middleware.
## About the changes
This is a rough initial version as a PoC for a permission matrix.
This is only available after enabling the flag `userAccessUIEnabled`
that is set to true by default in local development.
The access was added to the users' admin page but could be embedded in
different contexts (e.g. when assigning a role to a user):
This is how the matrix looks like
---------
Co-authored-by: Nuno Góis <github@nunogois.com>
### What
This PR makes the rate limit for user creation and simple login (our
password based login) configurable in the same way you can do
metricsRateLimiting.
### Worth noting
In addition this PR adds a `rate_limit{endpoint, method}` prometheus
gauge, which gets the data from the UnleashConfig.
This commit changes our linter/formatter to biome (https://biomejs.dev/)
Causing our prehook to run almost instantly, and our "yarn lint" task to
run in sub 100ms.
Some trade-offs:
* Biome isn't quite as well established as ESLint
* Are we ready to install a different vscode plugin (the biome plugin)
instead of the prettier plugin
The configuration set for biome also has a set of recommended rules,
this is turned on by default, in order to get to something that was
mergeable I have turned off a couple the rules we seemed to violate the
most, that we also explicitly told eslint to ignore.
https://linear.app/unleash/issue/2-1136/custom-root-roles-documentation
- [Adds documentation referencing custom root
roles](https://unleash-docs-git-docs-custom-root-roles-unleash-team.vercel.app/reference/rbac);
- [Adds a "How to create and assign custom root roles" how-to
guide](https://unleash-docs-git-docs-custom-root-roles-unleash-team.vercel.app/how-to/how-to-create-and-assign-custom-root-roles);
- Standardizes "global" roles to "root" roles;
- Standardizes "standard" roles to "predefined" roles to better reflect
their behavior and what is shown in our UI;
- Updates predefined role descriptions and makes them consistent;
- Updates the side panel description of the user form;
- Includes some boy scouting with some tiny fixes of things identified
along the way (e.g. the role form was persisting old data when closed
and re-opened);
Questions:
- Is it worth expanding the "Assigning custom root roles" section in the
"How to create and assign custom root roles" guide to include the steps
for assigning a root role for each entity (user, service account,
group)?
- Should this PR include an update to the existing "How to create and
assign custom project roles" guide? We've since updated the UI;
---------
Co-authored-by: Thomas Heartman <thomas@getunleash.ai>
## About the changes
Implements custom root roles, encompassing a lot of different areas of
the project, and slightly refactoring the current roles logic. It
includes quite a clean up.
This feature itself is behind a flag: `customRootRoles`
This feature covers root roles in:
- Users;
- Service Accounts;
- Groups;
Apologies in advance. I may have gotten a bit carried away 🙈
### Roles
We now have a new admin tab called "Roles" where we can see all root
roles and manage custom ones. We are not allowed to edit or remove
*predefined* roles.
This meant slightly pushing away the existing roles to `project-roles`
instead. One idea we want to explore in the future is to unify both
types of roles in the UI instead of having 2 separate tabs. This
includes modernizing project roles to fit more into our current design
and decisions.
Hovering the permissions cell expands detailed information about the
role:
### Create and edit role
Here's how the role form looks like (create / edit):
Here I categorized permissions so it's easier to visualize and manage
from a UX perspective.
I'm using the same endpoint as before. I tried to unify the logic and
get rid of the `projectRole` specific hooks. What distinguishes custom
root roles from custom project roles is the extra `root-custom` type we
see on the payload. By default we assume `custom` (custom project role)
instead, which should help in terms of backwards compatibility.
### Delete role
When we delete a custom role we try to help the end user make an
informed decision by listing all the entities which currently use this
custom root role:
~~As mentioned in the screenshot, when deleting a custom role, we demote
all entities associated with it to the predefined `Viewer` role.~~
**EDIT**: Apparently we currently block this from the API
(access-service deleteRole) with a message:
What should the correct behavior be?
### Role selector
I added a new easy-to-use role selector component that is present in:
- Users
- Service Accounts
- Groups
### Role description
I also added a new role description component that you can see below the
dropdown in the selector component, but it's also used to better
describe each role in the respective tables:
I'm not listing all the permissions of predefined roles. Those simply
show the description in the tooltip:
### Role badge
Groups is a bit different, since it uses a list of cards, so I added yet
another component - Role badge:
I'm using this same component on the profile tab:
## Discussion points
- Are we being defensive enough with the use of the flag? Should we
cover more?
- Are we breaking backwards compatibility in any way?
- What should we do when removing a role? Block or demote?
- Maybe some existing permission-related issues will surface with this
change: Are we being specific enough with our permissions? A lot of
places are simply checking for `ADMIN`;
- We may want to get rid of the API roles coupling we have with the
users and SAs and instead use the new hooks (e.g. `useRoles`)
explicitly;
- We should update the docs;
- Maybe we could allow the user to add a custom role directly from the
role selector component;
---------
Co-authored-by: Gastón Fournier <gaston@getunleash.io>
https://linear.app/unleash/issue/2-1071/prevent-users-from-disabling-password-authentication-when-there-are-no
Improves the behavior of disabling password based login by adding some
relevant information and a confirmation dialog with a warning. This felt
better than trying to disable the toggle, by still allowing the end
users to make the decision, except now it should be a properly informed
decision with confirmation.
- **Password based administrators**: Admin accounts that have a password
set;
- **Other administrators**: Other admin users that do not have a
password. May be SSO, but may also be users that did not set a password
yet;
- **Admin service accounts**: Service accounts that have the admin root
role. Depending on how you're using the SA this may not necessarily mean
locking yourself out of an admin account, especially if you secured its
token beforehand;
- **Admin API tokens**: Similar to the above. If you secured an admin
API token beforehand, you still have access to all features through the
API;
Each one of them link to the respective page inside Unleash (e.g. users
page, service accounts page, tokens page...);
If you try to disable and press "save", and only in that scenario, you
are presented with the following confirmation dialog:
### What
In the demo when listing possible users to grant access to your project,
we inadvertently expose emails when listing users you can grant access
to. This PR anonymises the access list on the way out.
feat: adds a way to specify a root role on a group, which will cause any user entering into that group to take on the permissions of that root role
Co-authored-by: Nuno Góis <github@nunogois.com>
<!-- Thanks for creating a PR! To make it easier for reviewers and
everyone else to understand what your changes relate to, please add some
relevant content to the headings below. Feel free to ignore or delete
sections that you don't think are relevant. Thank you! ❤️ -->
## About the changes
<!-- Describe the changes introduced. What are they and why are they
being introduced? Feel free to also add screenshots or steps to view the
changes if they're visual. -->
<!-- Does it close an issue? Multiple? -->
Closes #
[1-743](https://linear.app/unleash/issue/1-743/add-cypress-test-for-notifications-happy-path)
<!-- (For internal contributors): Does it relate to an issue on public
roadmap? -->
<!--
Relates to [roadmap](https://github.com/orgs/Unleash/projects/10) item:
#
-->
### Important files
<!-- PRs can contain a lot of changes, but not all changes are equally
important. Where should a reviewer start looking to get an overview of
the changes? Are any files particularly important? -->
## Discussion points
<!-- Anything about the PR you'd like to discuss before it gets merged?
Got any questions or doubts? -->
---------
Signed-off-by: andreas-unleash <andreas@getunleash.ai>
* fix: remove unused exp flag
* fix: remove unused flag
* fix: add support for external flag resolver
* fix: rename flagsresolver to flagresolver
* fix: disable external flag resolver
* fix: refactor a bit
* fix: stop using unleash in server-dev
* fix: remove userGroups flag
* fix: revert bumping frontend
* Docs: start experimenting with OpenAPI and docusaurus
* Docs: add docusaurus-theme-openapi-docs pkg
* Wip: current status
* Docs: Add 'docusaurus-plugin-api-docs'
* Move openapi into own sidebar; generate from localhost
* Chore: Update docusaurus plugin for OpenAPI
* Add website/yarn.lock to git
* Fix: fix CSS warning by using flex-end instead of end
* docs: make openapi generated code work again
* docs: make tags work properly with openapi sidebar
* Docs/chore: update OpenAPI tag scheme.
Add a whole bunch of new tags to make it easier to understand
available tags in OpenAPI.
* docs: point to new openapi docs from old api docs
* docs: typo
* Docs: link restructure
* docs: add operation indicators to openapi docs
* docs: change badge color for operations
* docs: update openapi-docs package
It now sorts tags the same as the schema
* docs: pluralize APIs in slug
* docs: update links to generated api docs
* docs: update openapi snapshot tests with new tags
* docs: conditionally load spec from localhost or from file
* docs: Remove changes relating to immediate switchover
* refactor: rename types; extract into separate file
* docs: fix api doc links
* Refactor: move openapi utils into /util directory
* Refactor: move utils test into `util` directory
* Refactor: don't expose standard responses tied to status codes
* Feat: update empty response description + make it const
* Chore: update snapshot with new response descriptions
* refactor: add schemas to user admin controller
* refactor: remove unused SessionService
* refactor: fix search query type confusion
* refactor: add schemas to user controller (#1693)
* refactor: add schemas to user controller
* refactor: fix getAllUserSplashes method name
* refactor: name and email should not be required on create
* refactor: only some user fields may be updated
* refactor: should not require any fields on user update (#1730)
* refactor: send 400 instead of 500 on missing username and email
* refactor: should not require any fields for user update
* refactor: note that earlier versions required name or email
* refactor: merge roleDescriptionSchema and roleSchema
This allows frontend to support a toggle for admins wanting to create
users and passwords manually, without sending emails to users they
create.
Co-authored-by: Ivar Conradi Østhus <ivarconr@gmail.com>
By having the controller perform try/catch around the
handler function allows us to add extra safety to all
our controllers and safeguards that we will always catch
exceptions thrown by a controller method.
* feat: send email when adding a new user
* fix: rename method
* fix: create welcome email
* fix: update email templates
* fix: add name to templates
* refactor: reduce database calls to one
* fix: alter tests
* fix: remove console logs
