This PR fixes the isOss check for the licensed users component. It also
addresses two things in the UI:
1. It right-aligns the text on the button so that when we get narrower,
the text doesn't slide to the center. There's a few more things that we
can fix later, though. When you press it, it'll still show the entire
button layout:
And when you focus it with a keyboard it still looks like a button.
We can get around that by using a regular button and just styling it a
bit, but making the text align will take some extra jimmying around (not
done in this pr, but got stashed changes for it)
But this is what it'd look like now with centered text:
2. It wraps the entire left column in a `p` tag, because they belong
together. They're not two logical paragraphs. So instead, we wrap them
in spans and surround them in a
p. `Display: contents` makes the p "invisible", so its children act as
if
they're children of the container above it instead.
This PR improves handling of very narrow screens for the project status
header:
- Add a right margin so that it won't overlap with the close button.
- Make it so the icon in the header doesn't shrink.
This PR fixes three things that were wrong with the lifecycle summary
count query:
1. When counting the number of flags in each stage, it does not take
into account whether a flag has moved out of that stage. So if you have
a flag that's gone through initial -> pre-live -> live, it'll be counted
for each one of those steps, not just the last one.
2. Some flags that have been archived don't have the corresponding
archived state row in the db. This causes them to count towards their
other recorded lifecycle stages, even when they shouldn't. This is
related to the previous one, but slightly different. Cross-reference the
features table's archived_at to make sure it hasn't been archived
3. The archived number should probably be all flags ever archived in the
project, regardless of whether they were archived before or after
feature lifecycles. So we should check the feature table's archived_at
flag for the count there instead
https://linear.app/unleash/issue/2-2989/unleash-payg-auto-traffic-billing
Integrates auto traffic bundle billing with PAYG.
Currently assumes the PAYG traffic bundle will have the same
`$5/1_000_000` cost as the existing Pro traffic bundle, with the same
`53_000_000` included requests. However some adjustments are included so
it's easier to change this in the future.
This PR fixes an issue where the personal dashboard would fail to render
if the flag was called `.` (Curiously, it was not an issue with `..`;
probably because they end up accessing different URLs).
I've taken the very pragmatic approach here of saying "right, we know
that `.` and `..` cause issues, let's just not even try to fetch data
for them".
The option, of course, is to bake in more error handling in the
components, but due to how we've got hooks depending on each other, it's
a bit of a rabbit hole to go down. I think this is a good compromise for
now.
So now, you'll get this instead:
I've also gone and updated the text for when we get a metrics fetching
error, because this probably isn't due to the flag name anymore. If it
is, we want to know.
This PR:
- conditionally deprecates the project health report endpoint. We only
use this for technical debt dashboard that we're removing. Now it's
deprecated once you turn the simplifiy flag on.
- extracts the calculate project health function into the project health
functions file in the appropriate domain folder. That same function is
now shared by the project health service and the project status service.
For the last point, it's a little outside of how we normally do things,
because it takes its stores as arguments, but it slots in well in that
file. An option would be to make a project health read model and then
wire that up in a couple places. It's more code, but probably closer to
how we do things in general. That said, I wanted to suggest this because
it's quick and easy (why do much work when little work do trick?).
This PR updates the project status service (and schemas and UI) to use
the project's current health instead of the 4-week average.
I nabbed the `calculateHealthRating` from
`src/lib/services/project-health-service.ts` instead of relying on the
service itself, because that service relies on the project service,
which relies on pretty much everything in the entire system.
However, I think we can split the health service into a service that
*does* need the project service (which is used for 1 of 3 methods) and a
service (or read model) that doesn't. We could then rely on the second
one for this service without too much overhead. Or we could extract the
`calculateHealthRating` into a shared function that takes its stores as
arguments. ... but I suggest doing that in a follow-up PR.
Because the calculation has been tested other places (especially if we
rely on a service / shared function for it), I've simplified the tests
to just verify that it's present.
I've changed the schema's `averageHealth` into an object in case we want
to include average health etc. in the future, but this is up for debate.
This change updates the "view unhealthy flags" link in the project
status sidebar to use the correct filter. The previous link was put in
before we had a filter for potentially stale, so this updates the link
to use that filter.
This PR fixes the counting of unhealthy flags for the project status
page. The issue was that we were looking for `archived = false`, but we
don't set that flag in the db anymore. Instead, we set the `archived_at`
date, which should be null if the flag is unarchived.
**This migration introduces a query that calculates the licensed user
counts and inserts them into the licensed_users table.**
**The logic ensures that:**
1. All users created up to a specific date are included as active users
until they are explicitly deleted.
2. Deleted users are excluded after their deletion date, except when
their deletion date falls within the last 30 days or before their
creation date.
3. The migration avoids duplicating data by ensuring records are only
inserted if they don’t already exist in the licensed_users table.
**Logic Breakdown:**
**Identify User Events (user_events):** Extracts email addresses from
user-related events (user-created and user-deleted) and tracks the type
and timestamp of the event. This step ensures the ability to
differentiate between user creation and deletion activities.
**Generate a Date Range (dates):** Creates a continuous range of dates
spanning from the earliest recorded event up to the current date. This
ensures we analyze every date, even those without events.
**Determine Active Users (active_emails):** Links dates with user events
to calculate the status of each email address (active or deleted) on a
given day. This step handles:
- The user's creation date.
- The user's deletion date (if applicable).
**Calculate Daily Active User Counts (result):**
For each date, counts the distinct email addresses that are active based
on the conditions:
- The user has no deletion date.
- The user's deletion date is within the last 30 days relative to the
current date.
- The user's creation date is before the deletion date.
This PR adds the option to select potentially stale flags from the UI.
It also updates the name we use for parsing from the API: instead of
`potentiallyStale` we use `potentially-stale`. This follows the
precedent set by "kill switch" (which we send as 'kill-switch'), the
only other multi-word option that I could find in our filters.
This PR adds support for the `potentiallyStale` value in the feature
search API. The value is added as a third option for `state` (in
addition to `stale` and `active`). Potentially stale is a subset of
active flags, so stale flags are never considered potentially stale,
even if they have the flag set in the db.
Because potentially stale is a separate column in the db, this
complicates the query a bit. As such, I've created a specialized
handling function in the feature search store: if the query doesn't
include `potentiallyStale`, handle it as we did before (the mapping has
just been moved). If the query *does* contain potentially stale, though,
the handling is quite a bit more involved because we need to check
multiple different columns against each other.
In essence, it's based on this logic:
when you’re searching for potentially stale flags, you should only get flags that are active and marked as potentially stale. You should not get stale flags.
This can cause some confusion, because in the db, we don’t clear the potentially stale status when we mark a flag as stale, so we can get flags that are both stale and potentially stale.
However, as a user, if you’re looking for potentially stale flags, I’d be surprised to also get (only some) stale flags, because if a flag is stale, it’s definitely stale, not potentially stale.
This leads us to these six different outcomes we need to handle when your search includes potentially stale and stale or active:
1. You filter for “potentially stale” flags only. The API will give you only flags that are active and marked as potentially stale. You will not get stale flags.
2. You filter only for flags that are not potentially stale. You will get all flags that are active and not potentially stale and all stale flags.
3. You search for “is any of stale, potentially stale”. This is our “unhealthy flags” metric. You get all stale flags and all flags that are active and potentially stale
4. You search for “is none of stale, potentially stale”: This gives you all flags that are active and not potentially stale. Healthy flags, if you will.
5. “is any of active, potentially stale”: you get all active flags. Because we treat potentially stale as a subset of active, this is the same as “is active”
6. “is none of active, potentially stale”: you get all stale flags. As in the previous point, this is the same as “is not active”
This change adds a db migration to make the potentially_stale column
non-nullable. It'll set any NULL values to `false`.
In the down-migration, make the column nullable again.
