With three and four different parameters (of which two are strings that
are easily interchanged), it makes sense to rewrite these two functions
to take named parameters instead. This is a follow-up to
https://github.com/Unleash/unleash/pull/10689 based on one of the review
comments.
Fixes an issue where the project feature list (and potentially other
places in the app that use the `useClearSWRCache` hook) would end up in
an infinite loading screen because the latest entry that we want to show
was overwritten.
The primary reason this happened is that we used `keysToDelete =
array.slice(SWR_CACHE_SIZE - 1)`. Because the map keys are returned in
insertion order, this would make us never delete the oldest keys, but
always anything after the cache reached it's maximum size. The fix was
to instead do `slice(0, -(SWR_CACHE_SIZE - 1))`, unless that is `0, 0`.
If so, then just delete the entire filtered keys set.
As a bonus: this PR also deduplicates cache entries that have the same
query params but in different order for the feature search. This further
reduces the cache space needed.
Adds a paginated table to the change request overview page and
integrates it with the search API hook.
The current implementation still has some rough edges to work out, but
it's getting closer.
There's no sort buttons in this implementation. I've got it working on
the side, but TS is complaining about types not matching up, so I'm
spinning that out to a separate PR.
<img width="1808" height="1400" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/bdee97b7-ee2a-46c0-8460-a8b8e14d3c92"
/>
Adds a use change request search hook. The hook (and tests) are based
closely on the `useFeatureSearch` files.
I will wire them up to the table in an upcoming PR.
Also: fixes the orval schema to use numbers for offset and limit instead
of strings (enterprise pr incoming). Plus: updates a variable usage in
the use feature search hook.
This PR cleans up the releasePlans flag. These changes were
automatically generated by AI and should be reviewed carefully.
Fixes#10536
## 🧹 AI Flag Cleanup Summary
The `releasePlans` feature flag has been removed, making the feature
permanently
available for Enterprise customers. All conditional logic and checks
related to
this flag have been removed from the codebase.
This change ensures that Release Plans are an integral part of the
Unleash
Enterprise offering.
### 🚮 Removed
- **Flag Definitions**
- `releasePlans` flag from `experimental.ts` in the backend.
- `releasePlans` flag from `uiConfig.ts` in the frontend.
- `releasePlans` flag from `server-dev.ts` development config.
- **Conditional Logic**
- Removed checks for `releasePlansEnabled` in components and hooks,
including
`ReleaseManagement.tsx`, `FeatureStrategyMenu.tsx`, and
`NewInUnleash.tsx`.
- Removed `useUiFlag('releasePlans')` calls from all frontend files.
- Removed the `flag: 'releasePlans'` property from route definitions in
`routes.ts`.
### 🛠 Kept
- **Feature Functionality**
- All UI and logic related to Release Plans and Release Templates are
now
unconditionally enabled for Enterprise users.
### 📝 Why
The `releasePlans` feature has been successfully rolled out and is now a
stable
part of the product. This cleanup removes the artık feature flag to
simplify the
codebase and reduce complexity.
---------
Co-authored-by: unleash-bot <194219037+unleash-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Nuno Góis <github@nunogois.com>
- checkbox to select 'rate' vs 'increase' - always available for now,
but does nothing for gauge. I can improve it later on
- better preview - it will show resolved query underneath
- cleaner error handling that doesn't overflow widgets
Updates a few remaining places where we check constraint operators with
the new constraint operator checks. Additionally, because there was only
one remaining place where we used the `oneOf` function, I replaced it
with a normal `includes` check and deleted the `oneOf` util. From what I
can tell, there's no need to have that utility function; it doesn't
provide much benefit over using the language built-ins 🤷🏼
