This PR cleans up the addConfiguration flag. These changes were
automatically generated by AI and should be reviewed carefully.
Fixes#10627
## 🧹 AI Flag Cleanup Summary
This change removes the `addConfiguration` feature flag. The feature was
discarded, so this cleanup reverts the UI to its state before the
`addConfiguration` flag was introduced. The primary change is in the
strategy
menu, where the single "Add configuration" button is removed and the
original
"Use template," "Add strategy," and "More" buttons are restored.
### 🚮 Removed
- **Flag Definitions**
- `addConfiguration` flag from `experimental.ts` on the backend.
- `addConfiguration` flag from `uiConfig.ts` on the frontend.
- `addConfiguration: true` from the `server-dev.ts` config.
- **UI Components & Logic**
- The conditional rendering in `FeatureStrategyMenu.tsx` that showed an
"Add
configuration" button.
- The `useUiFlag('addConfiguration')` hook call and its import from
`FeatureStrategyMenu.tsx`.
### 🛠 Kept
- **UI Components & Logic**
- The original set of buttons in `FeatureStrategyMenu.tsx`: "Use
template",
"Add strategy", and a "More strategies" icon button. This was the code
path for
when the flag was disabled.
### 📝 Why
The `addConfiguration` feature flag was marked as completed with the
outcome
"discarded". This cleanup removes the flag and all related code,
preserving only
the intended code path, which is the UI behavior from before the flag
was
introduced.
---------
Co-authored-by: unleash-bot <194219037+unleash-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Nuno Góis <github@nunogois.com>
This PR cleans up the reportUnknownFlags flag. These changes were
automatically generated by AI and should be reviewed carefully.
Fixes#10595
## 🧹 AI Flag Cleanup Summary
This change removes the `reportUnknownFlags` feature flag and makes its
functionality a permanent part of the application. The "Unknown flags"
feature
is now always enabled.
### 🚮 Removed
- **Flag Definitions**
- Removed `reportUnknownFlags` from `IFlagKey` and `UiFlags` types.
- Removed `reportUnknownFlags` from the experimental flags configuration
in `src/lib/types/experimental.ts`.
- Removed the flag from development and test configurations
(`src/server-dev.ts`, `unknown-flags.e2e.test.ts`).
- **Conditional Logic**
- Removed conditional checks for `reportUnknownFlags` in backend
services
(`UnknownFlagsService`, `ClientMetricsServiceV2`) and API controllers
(`UnknownFlagsController`).
- Removed `useUiFlag('reportUnknownFlags')` and related conditional
rendering from frontend components (`UnknownFlagsTable`,
`FeatureToggleListTable`). The UI elements are now always visible.
- Modified the `useUnknownFlags` hook to always fetch data.
### 🛠 Kept
- **Core Functionality**
- The feature to report and display unknown flags is now always active.
- The "Unknown flags" link is now permanently visible on the feature
flags
overview page.
- Backend logic for processing and storing unknown flags is now always
executed.
### 📝 Why
The `reportUnknownFlags` feature flag was marked as completed with the
feature
being kept. This cleanup removes the flag and its associated conditional
logic,
simplifying the code and making the unknown flags reporting a permanent
feature.
---------
Co-authored-by: unleash-bot <194219037+unleash-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Nuno Góis <github@nunogois.com>
This PR cleans up the releasePlans flag. These changes were
automatically generated by AI and should be reviewed carefully.
Fixes#10536
## 🧹 AI Flag Cleanup Summary
The `releasePlans` feature flag has been removed, making the feature
permanently
available for Enterprise customers. All conditional logic and checks
related to
this flag have been removed from the codebase.
This change ensures that Release Plans are an integral part of the
Unleash
Enterprise offering.
### 🚮 Removed
- **Flag Definitions**
- `releasePlans` flag from `experimental.ts` in the backend.
- `releasePlans` flag from `uiConfig.ts` in the frontend.
- `releasePlans` flag from `server-dev.ts` development config.
- **Conditional Logic**
- Removed checks for `releasePlansEnabled` in components and hooks,
including
`ReleaseManagement.tsx`, `FeatureStrategyMenu.tsx`, and
`NewInUnleash.tsx`.
- Removed `useUiFlag('releasePlans')` calls from all frontend files.
- Removed the `flag: 'releasePlans'` property from route definitions in
`routes.ts`.
### 🛠 Kept
- **Feature Functionality**
- All UI and logic related to Release Plans and Release Templates are
now
unconditionally enabled for Enterprise users.
### 📝 Why
The `releasePlans` feature has been successfully rolled out and is now a
stable
part of the product. This cleanup removes the artık feature flag to
simplify the
codebase and reduce complexity.
---------
Co-authored-by: unleash-bot <194219037+unleash-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Nuno Góis <github@nunogois.com>
Doesn't clear the value from the constraint input value popover if you
close it and then re-open. In other words, if you accidentally click
out, you don't lose your progress. Instead, the popover will open again,
with the value you had when you closed it highlighted (so that it's easy
to type over if you want to):
<img width="452" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d86aa00e-4956-40a8-8fea-e75be5d5425b"
/>
The reason I'm changing this now is because I noticed that the error
wasn't cleared correctly when the popover was closed. If we do it this
way instead, then that makes sense, because you can still see the value.
This is also how the single-value popover has worked forever.
From some quick testing, the single value popover still works as
expected:
<img width="562" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9041a922-b055-4310-ab60-93ad219981a4"
/>
As a side note: I'm adding a comment to anyone coming after as to why
focus handling on escape doesn't work correctly on the single value
button. I was about to go down a rabbit hole on that before I read my
own comment on the previous PR. So I thought I'd put that here too.
Makes it so that the constraint value input gives you an error if you
try to add one or more values that **all** exist in the set of values
already. E.g. if you have `a` and `b`, and try to add `a`, it'll tell
you that "`a` has already been added". Likewise, if you try to add
`a,b`, it'll tell you that all these values already exist. However, if
at least one of the values does not exist, then it will allow you to
submit the values (we already do deduplication before storing anyway).
The background for this is that a user was confused thinking that just
one specific value didn't get added to their constraints. As it turns
out, they'd already added the value previously, so when it didn't show
up at the end of the list, they thought it didn't work at all.
<img width="863" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/12195e0a-04bc-4b41-bd44-432120c768a6"
/>
<img width="816" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/433a64d7-aec0-482d-8544-574656c266ce"
/>
---------
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Follow-up to: https://github.com/Unleash/unleash/pull/10213
This makes our `AddValuesPopover` backdrop click-through. This means you
can interact with any element in the "background" right away and it will
work, while closing the popover at the same time.
If this works well it may be worth extracting to a reusable
ClickThroughPopover or similar.
This PR takes two steps towards better constraint handling:
## New type: `IConstraintWithId`
Introduces a new type, `IConstraintWithId`. This is the same as an
`IConstraint`, except the constraint id property is required. The idea
is that the list of editable constraints should move towards using this
instead of just `IConstraint`. That should prevent us (on a type-level)
from seeing more of the same kind of errors we saw with the segment
constraints yesterday.
I don't want to go ahead and update all the upstream uses of this to
IConstraintWithId in this PR, so I'll look at that separately.
## API payload constraint replacer
Introduces an api payload constraint "replacer", which we can use for
[JSON.stringify's `replacer`
parameter](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/JSON/stringify#the_replacer_parameter).
The current implementation works both for strategies and for segments
and has been added to edit + create forms for both of these resources.
This has a couple benefits:
1. We can clearly state exactly how we want them to be rendered,
including property order. I've decided to go with context -> operator ->
value(s) as the main one (check the screenie), as I believe this is the
most logical reading order.
2. We can exclude value/values (whichever one doesn't work with the
operator)
3. It doesn't matter how we treat constraints internally, we can still
present the payload how we want
4. Importantly: this only affects the stringification for the
user-facing API payload, so it's very low risk. It does not affect
anything that we actually send to the api.
Here's what it can look like with ordered properties:
<img width="392" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f46f77c8-0b5a-4ded-b13a-bb567df60bd3"
/>
Prevents the property order from changing when constraints are set from
the editable constraint component. When we render out the API command,
we don't specify the order of properties in the objects, which means
that it can change dramatically, which can be a little jarring.
As it is right now, it first renders in one order when you open the
strategy form:
<img width="299" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/52cf2445-d9eb-402c-b5bc-0fece5fbe822"
/>
And when you navigate to the targeting section of the strategy form, it
changes to:
<img width="299" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e4cb7006-dcf4-4e88-befb-ccba5b647ddd"
/>
This also applies to constraints in segments.
With this change, the order will remain the same before and after.
Additionally, there's some extra tests around constraint ids being kept
the same and being set if it doesn't exist.
## Further work
This came about as part of the issue we had with constraint editing in
segments being broken as of now. As part of that, I would like to make
some further improvements (such as making the ID required when you use a
list of editable constraints), but that will be in a follow-up. There
are some complications that might not make it a viable option, sadly.
We could also try to stabilize the property order in the API rendering
methods (which I think might be a good idea), but because there's
multiple different ones, this seems to be a faster solution.
Addresses and removes all leftover comments related to the flag overview
redesign flag.
There's four changes here:
1. Remove release plan milestone strategy and environment footer.
Dangling files, no references.
2. Delete old code without references in theme.ts
3. Delete legacy playground result chip. Replace all references to it
with references to the new chip. The API is the exact same and the
legacy chip was just passing through everything to the new chip anyway,
so nothing should change.
4. Remove a now-redundant way to supply a default
Deletes the legacy strategy separator and removes all references to it.
Luckily, all references to the separator were in dangling files that
could themselves be deleted directly.
This PR addresses and removes the last comment related to the
addEditStrategy flag. In doing so, I have also removed the remaining
dangling files from the new constraint accordion directory. I believe
that everything that's left in there now is currently in use.
This PR removes more constraint inputs and validators that are not in
use anymore. Additionally, the old constraint components that are still
being used by the project action filter item, have been moved to that
directory. This also goes for ResolveInput which has been simplified to
only the inputs and operators used by actions filter item.
I've done a manual side-by-side comparison of the old and newly
refactored filter item, and it appears to be working the exact same.
This PR continues the cleanup after removing the addEditStrategy flag
(part 2 of ???). The primary purpose of this PR is to delete and remove
all references to the LegacyConstraintAccordion.
I've gone and updated all references to the legacy files in external
components and verified manually that they still work.
Most of the files in this PR are changing references. I've extracted two
bits into more general constants/utils:
1. Constraint IDs are a symbol. it was exported as a const from the
previous createEmptyConstraint file. I've moved it into constants.
2. formatOperatorDescription was similarly used all over the place, so
I've placed it in the shared utils directory.
In reviewing this, you can ignore any changes in the legacy constraint
accordion folder, because that's all been deleted. Instead, focus on the
changes in the other files. It's primarily just import updates, but
would be good to get a second set of eyes, anyway.
Fixes a console log about invalid dom nesting:
<img width="1256" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0849103c-6901-4b64-a124-00eaf8cc7dde"
/>
I've changed the offending div to a span. We set `display: flex` on it,
anyway, so it shouldn't make a difference.
I've also removed some redundant functions and braces that we don't
need.
Removes all usages of flag addEditStrategy and refactors code where
necessary.
This is only the first step of the cleanup. After this, there's still
lots of code to be removed. I've got a different PR that removes ~5k
lines of code (https://github.com/Unleash/unleash/pull/10105) that I
want to reach in pieces to make sure that everythnig works on the way
there.
Adds caching via localstorage to the flag creation form, so that if you
(accidentally) close the form before submitting it, you'll retain (most)
of the same data when you reopen it.
Specifically, we'll store:
- name
- description
- type
- tags
- impression data
We can't store the project as it is now, because it gets overridden by
whatever is in the URL. However, this is probably a good thing. It means
that if you navigate to a different project and open the feature
creation form there, it'll retain everything from the last one, but
it'll use the current project.
The stored data is cleared when you successfully create a feature, so
that you don't get dangling data.
The data is also stored in a shared cache for all projects, so that you
don't have different caches per project.
The behavior of seeding the form is hidden behind a flag (that doesn't
exist yet). We'll still read and write to the cache if the flag is off,
but we won't use it to populate the feature form, so it has no
discernible impact on the user.
## Bug detected 🐛 ... and squashed
Working on this, I came to realize that there was a bug in how the
config button and use feature form hooks interacted. We (in this case
probably me) have assumed that it's fine to use a set for any option
checking in the config buttons. Also, we're using a set to store tags in
the feature form. But objects aren't compared by value in JS, so the set
will happily accept multiple instances of the same tag. Likewise, these
tags won't show up as selected in the dropdown because when the dropdown
checks if the set `has` the value, it's using reference equality.
To get around this, I have normalized the values of the Tags set to
strings (`<type>:<value>`), which are easily comparable.
We can iterate on this later if we need to.
## `useLocalStorageState`
In doing this, I have also made a change to the useLocalStorageState
hook:
the exposed "setState" function now writes to the localstorage
immediately. This is because the useEffect method might not have time to
save the data if the component unmounts (this was the case with the flag
dialog).
However, I have kept the useEffect because it gets run on component
mount and then only when it changes. This means that we will get double
saves to localstorage, but it'll be with the same data, so it's benign.
I've tried out two other uses of the hook (event timeline props and
environment columns in the project flags table) and see no discernible
difference in behavior.
## `useFeatureForm`
I have also made a change to the useFeatureForm hook and removed a
`useEffect` that would reset the name to whatever you passed in as the
initial name if you cleared it out. This essentially meant that you
couldn't clear the name completely, because it would just refill with
the initial name.
As far as I can tell, there is no need to have this sticking around
anymore. The hook is only used in two places: the flag creation dialog
and the flag edit page. The flag edit page doesn't allow you to change
the name anyway and it was causing issues in the dialog. It's likely a
holdover from the way something worked 3 years ago. Both the dialog and
the edit screen seem to work just fine with this change.
I have also changed the function parameters from ordered parameters to
an object. There's so many of them that even you don't think it's a good
idea to use objects when you have multiple params with the same type,
it's just nigh-impossible to remember the order by now.
## Minor changes
Additionally, I came across three issues that were causing react errors,
and have fixed them.
1. we'd forgotten to interpolate a variable and just used the variable
name in a string instead
2. an html attribute that doesn't exist (`aria-role` instead of `role`)
3. Providing a disabled button inside a tooltip. I've seen this one
around for ages and it prevented tooltips from working on disabled
buttons. The solution was wrapping it in a span.
