This PR adds:
* Keyboard events
* Boxshadow
* Filtering by unread notifications
* Increases smartness for logic around when to prompt whether or not the
functionality is useful
This PR adds more capabilities to the notification UI. Including:
* Displaying new notification types
* Update visual expression based on whether it's read or not
* Mark items as read
* Follow the items link to go to the notification destination
* Cleanup and styled components
Initial draft for notifications UI behind a feature flag. I'd like to
get this merged because the PR is cluttered by open api generation. In
the next PR I will:
* Clean up the SX and introduce styled components
* Add a component for single notifications and implement the
notification list
This PR decouples the forms for creating API tokens and project level
API tokens. The point of having a hook that provides the functionality
for the form is that we can create specific forms that take care of
implementing the logic needed for that form instead of having one form
serving multiple use cases.
<!-- Thanks for creating a PR! To make it easier for reviewers and
everyone else to understand what your changes relate to, please add some
relevant content to the headings below. Feel free to ignore or delete
sections that you don't think are relevant. Thank you! ❤️ -->
## About the changes
<!-- Describe the changes introduced. What are they and why are they
being introduced? Feel free to also add screenshots or steps to view the
changes if they're visual. -->
<!-- Does it close an issue? Multiple? -->
Closes #
<!-- (For internal contributors): Does it relate to an issue on public
roadmap? -->
<!--
Relates to [roadmap](https://github.com/orgs/Unleash/projects/10) item:
#
-->
### Important files
<!-- PRs can contain a lot of changes, but not all changes are equally
important. Where should a reviewer start looking to get an overview of
the changes? Are any files particularly important? -->
## Discussion points
<!-- Anything about the PR you'd like to discuss before it gets merged?
Got any questions or doubts? -->
Signed-off-by: andreas-unleash <andreas@getunleash.ai>
<!-- Thanks for creating a PR! To make it easier for reviewers and
everyone else to understand what your changes relate to, please add some
relevant content to the headings below. Feel free to ignore or delete
sections that you don't think are relevant. Thank you! ❤️ -->
## About the changes
<!-- Describe the changes introduced. What are they and why are they
being introduced? Feel free to also add screenshots or steps to view the
changes if they're visual. -->
Define and implements Project api token permissions
Assign permissions to existing roles
Adjust UI to support them
Adjust BE to implement
---------
Signed-off-by: andreas-unleash <andreas@getunleash.ai>
Co-authored-by: Fredrik Strand Oseberg <fredrik.no@gmail.com>
<!-- Thanks for creating a PR! To make it easier for reviewers and
everyone else to understand what your changes relate to, please add some
relevant content to the headings below. Feel free to ignore or delete
sections that you don't think are relevant. Thank you! ❤️ -->
## About the changes
<!-- Describe the changes introduced. What are they and why are they
being introduced? Feel free to also add screenshots or steps to view the
changes if they're visual. -->
<!-- Does it close an issue? Multiple? -->
Closes #
[1-669](https://linear.app/unleash/issue/1-669/plausible-tracking-if-needed-in-preparation-for-beta)
<!-- (For internal contributors): Does it relate to an issue on public
roadmap? -->
<!--
Relates to [roadmap](https://github.com/orgs/Unleash/projects/10) item:
#
-->
### Important files
<!-- PRs can contain a lot of changes, but not all changes are equally
important. Where should a reviewer start looking to get an overview of
the changes? Are any files particularly important? -->
## Discussion points
<!-- Anything about the PR you'd like to discuss before it gets merged?
Got any questions or doubts? -->
---------
Signed-off-by: andreas-unleash <andreas@getunleash.ai>
## About the changes
Promoted experimental networkView flag into a configuration that relies
on prometheusApi being configured.
Also, a follow-up on https://github.com/Unleash/unleash/pull/3054 moving
this code to enterprise because it doesn't make sense to maintain this
code in OSS where it's not being used.
## About the changes
This PR prepares the GA of service accounts: OpenAPI tags, documentation
and flag removal
Relates to [roadmap](https://github.com/orgs/Unleash/projects/10) item:
#2942
---------
Co-authored-by: Nuno Góis <github@nunogois.com>
## About the changes
When checking for permissions we have 2 methods, one that is not change
request aware and one that is. We were using the one that is not aware
of CR while the feature we developed is aware of CR.
This PR switches to the correct method and documents the hooks
Add Tag dialog redesign to allow batch add
Some Refactoring
Signed-off-by: andreas-unleash <andreas@getunleash.ai>
<!-- Thanks for creating a PR! To make it easier for reviewers and
everyone else to understand what your changes relate to, please add some
relevant content to the headings below. Feel free to ignore or delete
sections that you don't think are relevant. Thank you! ❤️ -->
## About the changes
<!-- Describe the changes introduced. What are they and why are they
being introduced? Feel free to also add screenshots or steps to view the
changes if they're visual. -->
<!-- Does it close an issue? Multiple? -->
Closes
[1-611](https://linear.app/unleash/issue/1-611/create-a-auto-complete-component-for-tags)
<!-- (For internal contributors): Does it relate to an issue on public
roadmap? -->
<!--
Relates to [roadmap](https://github.com/orgs/Unleash/projects/10) item:
#
-->
### Important files
<!-- PRs can contain a lot of changes, but not all changes are equally
important. Where should a reviewer start looking to get an overview of
the changes? Are any files particularly important? -->
## Discussion points
<!-- Anything about the PR you'd like to discuss before it gets merged?
Got any questions or doubts? -->
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/104830839/216286897-4e392822-57c2-4e50-a5d8-e89d006b3fa5.mov
---------
Signed-off-by: andreas-unleash <andreas@getunleash.ai>
This PR fixes two problems:
(1) The initial redirect put us into an infinite loop when redirecting,
because trying to go back to the root would always trigger the initial
redirect component. Throwing you back to project screen.
(2) Using UI config in the useLastViewedProject to get the basePath
introduced a race condition where you needed data from the uiConfig in
order to fetch the correct key from local storage. The fix here was to
use the basePath coded into the HTML file, so we can synchronously
retrieve the correct key at startup.
Co-authored-by: kwasniew <kwasniewski.mateusz@gmail.com>
This PR fixes an error where useSWR would throw a TypeError: `subs[i] is
not a function`: https://github.com/vercel/swr/issues/2357
I can't be totally sure why this is happening but we had a design flaw
in our setup that caused our group overview to first fetch all groups,
and then subsequently fetch each individual group after the groups were
rendered. This was happening because GroupCard was rendering the
EditGroupUsers component which used the `useGroup(groupId)` getter.
The flow in the old version looked like this:
1. Fetch all the groups
2. Use the groups data to render all the `GroupCard` elements
3. Once the GroupCard was rendered the EditGroupComponent would be
mounted and set up a recurring GET on the individual group, causing each
group to be fetched recurringly in the Group overview.
The useSWR error seems to be connected to setting up these
subscriptions, and then removing the element from the DOM. We were able
to trigger this error by removing the group.
## How did we fix it?
We refactored the components concerned with editing group users and
removing groups to exist outside of the `GroupCard` and have the group
card supply the base data through a state setter. This pattern is also
better for the remove functionality because the remove functionality in
its current state could trigger a react update on a component removed
from the DOM if you awaited the refetching of the data. This is because
the groups data is controlling the rendering of the `GroupCard` and when
the `RemoveGroup` modal is nested underneath the `GroupCard` a refetch
would trigger an update, re-render the overview and remove the entire
`GroupCard` and the associated `RemoveGroup` component.
I'm still not sure if this is a bug with SWR or a side-effect of how we
architected the functionality, but this change seems to remove the
problem.
