We're migrating to ESM, which will allow us to import the latest
versions of our dependencies.
Co-Authored-By: Christopher Kolstad <chriswk@getunleash.io>
As part of preparation for ESM and node/TSC updates, this PR will make
Unleash build with strictNullChecks set to true, since that's what's in
our tsconfig file. Hence, this PR also removes the `--strictNullChecks
false` flag in our compile tasks in package.json.
TL;DR - Clean up your code rather than turning off compiler security
features :)
This PR adds the option to select potentially stale flags from the UI.
It also updates the name we use for parsing from the API: instead of
`potentiallyStale` we use `potentially-stale`. This follows the
precedent set by "kill switch" (which we send as 'kill-switch'), the
only other multi-word option that I could find in our filters.
This PR adds support for the `potentiallyStale` value in the feature
search API. The value is added as a third option for `state` (in
addition to `stale` and `active`). Potentially stale is a subset of
active flags, so stale flags are never considered potentially stale,
even if they have the flag set in the db.
Because potentially stale is a separate column in the db, this
complicates the query a bit. As such, I've created a specialized
handling function in the feature search store: if the query doesn't
include `potentiallyStale`, handle it as we did before (the mapping has
just been moved). If the query *does* contain potentially stale, though,
the handling is quite a bit more involved because we need to check
multiple different columns against each other.
In essence, it's based on this logic:
when you’re searching for potentially stale flags, you should only get flags that are active and marked as potentially stale. You should not get stale flags.
This can cause some confusion, because in the db, we don’t clear the potentially stale status when we mark a flag as stale, so we can get flags that are both stale and potentially stale.
However, as a user, if you’re looking for potentially stale flags, I’d be surprised to also get (only some) stale flags, because if a flag is stale, it’s definitely stale, not potentially stale.
This leads us to these six different outcomes we need to handle when your search includes potentially stale and stale or active:
1. You filter for “potentially stale” flags only. The API will give you only flags that are active and marked as potentially stale. You will not get stale flags.
2. You filter only for flags that are not potentially stale. You will get all flags that are active and not potentially stale and all stale flags.
3. You search for “is any of stale, potentially stale”. This is our “unhealthy flags” metric. You get all stale flags and all flags that are active and potentially stale
4. You search for “is none of stale, potentially stale”: This gives you all flags that are active and not potentially stale. Healthy flags, if you will.
5. “is any of active, potentially stale”: you get all active flags. Because we treat potentially stale as a subset of active, this is the same as “is active”
6. “is none of active, potentially stale”: you get all stale flags. As in the previous point, this is the same as “is not active”
Archived features can be searched now.
This is the backend and small parts of frontend preparing to add
filters, buttons etc in next PR.
---------
Co-authored-by: Thomas Heartman <thomas@getunleash.io>
Previously we expected the tag to look like `type:value`. Now we allow
everything after first colon, as the value and not break query
`type:this:still:is:value`.
Instead of running exists on every row, we are joining the exists, which
runs the query only once.
This decreased load time on my huge dataset from 2000ms to 200ms.
Also added tests that values still come through as expected.
Instead of running exists on every row, we are joining the exists, which
runs the query only once.
This decreased load time on my huge dataset from 2000ms to 200ms.
Also added tests that values still come through as expected.
Final rank has always been ordering correctly by default. But after 5.12
I see some issues that sometimes it is not ordered. Just to be extra
sure, I am for ordering it.
Two changes were needed to sort better
1. Since we are still using `last seen` from `features` table for
backwards compatibility, we needed to add it to sort condition.
2. Nulls break the order, so now sorting nulls as last.
