## About the changes
Implements custom root roles, encompassing a lot of different areas of
the project, and slightly refactoring the current roles logic. It
includes quite a clean up.
This feature itself is behind a flag: `customRootRoles`
This feature covers root roles in:
- Users;
- Service Accounts;
- Groups;
Apologies in advance. I may have gotten a bit carried away 🙈
### Roles
We now have a new admin tab called "Roles" where we can see all root
roles and manage custom ones. We are not allowed to edit or remove
*predefined* roles.
This meant slightly pushing away the existing roles to `project-roles`
instead. One idea we want to explore in the future is to unify both
types of roles in the UI instead of having 2 separate tabs. This
includes modernizing project roles to fit more into our current design
and decisions.
Hovering the permissions cell expands detailed information about the
role:
### Create and edit role
Here's how the role form looks like (create / edit):
Here I categorized permissions so it's easier to visualize and manage
from a UX perspective.
I'm using the same endpoint as before. I tried to unify the logic and
get rid of the `projectRole` specific hooks. What distinguishes custom
root roles from custom project roles is the extra `root-custom` type we
see on the payload. By default we assume `custom` (custom project role)
instead, which should help in terms of backwards compatibility.
### Delete role
When we delete a custom role we try to help the end user make an
informed decision by listing all the entities which currently use this
custom root role:
~~As mentioned in the screenshot, when deleting a custom role, we demote
all entities associated with it to the predefined `Viewer` role.~~
**EDIT**: Apparently we currently block this from the API
(access-service deleteRole) with a message:
What should the correct behavior be?
### Role selector
I added a new easy-to-use role selector component that is present in:
- Users
- Service Accounts
- Groups
### Role description
I also added a new role description component that you can see below the
dropdown in the selector component, but it's also used to better
describe each role in the respective tables:
I'm not listing all the permissions of predefined roles. Those simply
show the description in the tooltip:
### Role badge
Groups is a bit different, since it uses a list of cards, so I added yet
another component - Role badge:
I'm using this same component on the profile tab:
## Discussion points
- Are we being defensive enough with the use of the flag? Should we
cover more?
- Are we breaking backwards compatibility in any way?
- What should we do when removing a role? Block or demote?
- Maybe some existing permission-related issues will surface with this
change: Are we being specific enough with our permissions? A lot of
places are simply checking for `ADMIN`;
- We may want to get rid of the API roles coupling we have with the
users and SAs and instead use the new hooks (e.g. `useRoles`)
explicitly;
- We should update the docs;
- Maybe we could allow the user to add a custom role directly from the
role selector component;
---------
Co-authored-by: Gastón Fournier <gaston@getunleash.io>
<!-- Thanks for creating a PR! To make it easier for reviewers and
everyone else to understand what your changes relate to, please add some
relevant content to the headings below. Feel free to ignore or delete
sections that you don't think are relevant. Thank you! ❤️ -->
## About the changes
<!-- Describe the changes introduced. What are they and why are they
being introduced? Feel free to also add screenshots or steps to view the
changes if they're visual. -->
Adds feature usage info and custom strategy counters to the version
check object.
<!-- Does it close an issue? Multiple? -->
Closes #
<!-- (For internal contributors): Does it relate to an issue on public
roadmap? -->
<!--
Relates to [roadmap](https://github.com/orgs/Unleash/projects/10) item:
#
-->
### Important files
<!-- PRs can contain a lot of changes, but not all changes are equally
important. Where should a reviewer start looking to get an overview of
the changes? Are any files particularly important? -->
## Discussion points
<!-- Anything about the PR you'd like to discuss before it gets merged?
Got any questions or doubts? -->
https://linear.app/unleash/issue/2-1071/prevent-users-from-disabling-password-authentication-when-there-are-no
Improves the behavior of disabling password based login by adding some
relevant information and a confirmation dialog with a warning. This felt
better than trying to disable the toggle, by still allowing the end
users to make the decision, except now it should be a properly informed
decision with confirmation.
- **Password based administrators**: Admin accounts that have a password
set;
- **Other administrators**: Other admin users that do not have a
password. May be SSO, but may also be users that did not set a password
yet;
- **Admin service accounts**: Service accounts that have the admin root
role. Depending on how you're using the SA this may not necessarily mean
locking yourself out of an admin account, especially if you secured its
token beforehand;
- **Admin API tokens**: Similar to the above. If you secured an admin
API token beforehand, you still have access to all features through the
API;
Each one of them link to the respective page inside Unleash (e.g. users
page, service accounts page, tokens page...);
If you try to disable and press "save", and only in that scenario, you
are presented with the following confirmation dialog:
<!-- Thanks for creating a PR! To make it easier for reviewers and
everyone else to understand what your changes relate to, please add some
relevant content to the headings below. Feel free to ignore or delete
sections that you don't think are relevant. Thank you! ❤️ -->
Adds default strategy to project environment link table
## About the changes
<!-- Describe the changes introduced. What are they and why are they
being introduced? Feel free to also add screenshots or steps to view the
changes if they're visual. -->
<!-- Does it close an issue? Multiple? -->
Closes #
[1-876](https://linear.app/unleash/issue/1-876/default-strategy-backend)
<!-- (For internal contributors): Does it relate to an issue on public
roadmap? -->
<!--
Relates to [roadmap](https://github.com/orgs/Unleash/projects/10) item:
#
-->
### Important files
<!-- PRs can contain a lot of changes, but not all changes are equally
important. Where should a reviewer start looking to get an overview of
the changes? Are any files particularly important? -->
## Discussion points
<!-- Anything about the PR you'd like to discuss before it gets merged?
Got any questions or doubts? -->
---------
Signed-off-by: andreas-unleash <andreas@getunleash.ai>
This PR updates the OpenAPI schemas for all the operations tagged with
"addons". In doing so, I also uncovered a few bugs and inconsistencies.
These have also been fixed.
## Changes
I've added inline comments to the changed files to call out anything
that I think is worth clarifying specifically. As an overall
description, this PR does the following:
Splits `addon-schema` into `addon-schema` and
`addon-create-update-schema`. The former is used when describing addons
that exist within Unleash and contain IDs and `created_at` timestamps.
The latter is used when creating or updating addons.
Adds examples and descriptions to all relevant schemas (and their
dependencies).
Updates addons operations descriptions and response codes (including the
recently introduced 413 and 415).
Fixes a bug where the server would crash if it didn't recognize the
addon provider (test added).
Fixes a bug where updating an addon wouldn't return anything, even if
the API said that it would. (test added)
Resolves some inconsistencies in handling of addon description. (tests
added)
### Addon descriptions
when creating addons, descriptions are optional. The original
`addonSchema` said they could be `null | string | undefined`. This
caused some inconsistencies in return values. Sometimes they were
returned, other times not. I've made it so that `descriptions` are now
always returned from the API. If it's not defined or if it's set to
`null`, the API will return `description: null`.
### `IAddonDto`
`IAddonDto`, the type we used internally to model the incoming addons
(for create and update) says that `description` is required. This hasn't
been true at least since we introduced OpenAPI schemas. As such, the
update and insert methods that the service uses were incompatible with
the **actual** data that we require.
I've changed the type to reflect reality for now. Assuming the tests
pass, this **should** all be good, but I'd like the reviewer(s) to give
this a think too.
---------
Co-authored-by: Christopher Kolstad <chriswk@getunleash.ai>
<!-- Thanks for creating a PR! To make it easier for reviewers and
everyone else to understand what your changes relate to, please add some
relevant content to the headings below. Feel free to ignore or delete
sections that you don't think are relevant. Thank you! ❤️ -->
Backports stickiness fixes
## About the changes
<!-- Describe the changes introduced. What are they and why are they
being introduced? Feel free to also add screenshots or steps to view the
changes if they're visual. -->
<!-- Does it close an issue? Multiple? -->
Closes #
<!-- (For internal contributors): Does it relate to an issue on public
roadmap? -->
<!--
Relates to [roadmap](https://github.com/orgs/Unleash/projects/10) item:
#
-->
### Important files
<!-- PRs can contain a lot of changes, but not all changes are equally
important. Where should a reviewer start looking to get an overview of
the changes? Are any files particularly important? -->
## Discussion points
<!-- Anything about the PR you'd like to discuss before it gets merged?
Got any questions or doubts? -->
---------
Signed-off-by: andreas-unleash <andreas@getunleash.ai>
Co-authored-by: Gastón Fournier <gaston@getunleash.io>
Co-authored-by: GitHub Actions Bot <>
Co-authored-by: Mateusz Kwasniewski <kwasniewski.mateusz@gmail.com>
<!-- Thanks for creating a PR! To make it easier for reviewers and
everyone else to understand what your changes relate to, please add some
relevant content to the headings below. Feel free to ignore or delete
sections that you don't think are relevant. Thank you! ❤️ -->
Changes the schema and api to accept any string for defaultStickiness
## About the changes
<!-- Describe the changes introduced. What are they and why are they
being introduced? Feel free to also add screenshots or steps to view the
changes if they're visual. -->
<!-- Does it close an issue? Multiple? -->
Closes #
<!-- (For internal contributors): Does it relate to an issue on public
roadmap? -->
<!--
Relates to [roadmap](https://github.com/orgs/Unleash/projects/10) item:
#
-->
### Important files
<!-- PRs can contain a lot of changes, but not all changes are equally
important. Where should a reviewer start looking to get an overview of
the changes? Are any files particularly important? -->
## Discussion points
<!-- Anything about the PR you'd like to discuss before it gets merged?
Got any questions or doubts? -->
---------
Signed-off-by: andreas-unleash <andreas@getunleash.ai>
<!-- Thanks for creating a PR! To make it easier for reviewers and
everyone else to understand what your changes relate to, please add some
relevant content to the headings below. Feel free to ignore or delete
sections that you don't think are relevant. Thank you! ❤️ -->
## About the changes
<!-- Describe the changes introduced. What are they and why are they
being introduced? Feel free to also add screenshots or steps to view the
changes if they're visual. -->
<!-- Does it close an issue? Multiple? -->
Closes #
<!-- (For internal contributors): Does it relate to an issue on public
roadmap? -->
<!--
Relates to [roadmap](https://github.com/orgs/Unleash/projects/10) item:
#
-->
### Important files
<!-- PRs can contain a lot of changes, but not all changes are equally
important. Where should a reviewer start looking to get an overview of
the changes? Are any files particularly important? -->
## Discussion points
<!-- Anything about the PR you'd like to discuss before it gets merged?
Got any questions or doubts? -->
---------
Signed-off-by: andreas-unleash <andreas@getunleash.ai>
This PR takes the project status API a step further by adding the
capability of providing a date to control the selection. We are
currently making calculations based on a gliding 30 day window, updated
once a day. The initial database structure and method for updating the
UI is outlined in this PR.
## About the changes
Add warnings when we detect something might be wrong with the customer
configuration, in particular with regard to variants configuration
## Rationale
Moving from variants per feature to variants per environment will allow
users to have fine-grained permissions and more control over variants on
different environments: #2254
But because this requires an additional step of copying variants to
other environments, we identified the potential risk of users forgetting
to follow this step. To keep them informed about this, we're introducing
a warning sign after a toggle is enabled when we detect that:
1. The environment is enabled without variants
2. Other enabled environments have variants
This situation would be a problem if you rely on `getVariant` method
from the SDK, because without variants you'll receive the default
variant. Probably, not what you'd expect after enabling the toggle, but
there are situations where this might be correct. Because of the latter,
we thought that adding a warning and letting the user handle the
situation was the best solution.
## UI sketches
Co-authored-by: Nuno Góis <github@nunogois.com>
## About the changes
This PR adds the ability to push variants to multiple environments
overriding the existing variants.
Relates to [roadmap](https://github.com/orgs/Unleash/projects/10) item:
#2254
**Note:** This won't fail if there are variants in other environments, because the operation wouldn't be idempotent. It should have that property because setting variants to 1 or more environments once or twice should not make a difference
## What
Previously when importing strategies we've used the same data type we've
used for creating strategies (the minimal, a name, an optional
description, optional parameters and an optional editable column). This
meant that exporting strategies and then importing them would reactivate
deprecated strategies. This PR changes to allow the import to preserve
all the data coming in the export file.
## Tests
Added four new tests, two new unit tests using our fake stores and two
new e2e tests. Interestingly the ones in the fake store ran green before
this change as well, probably because we just insert the parsed json
object in the fake store, whereas the real store actually converts the
object from camelCasing to the postgresql snake_casing standard.
## Discussion points:
### Mismatch between fake and real stores
This is inevitable since storing things in javascript arrays vs saving
in a real database will have some differences, but this again shows the
value of our e2e tests.
### Invariants
Should we see if we can add some invariants to our import/export so that
we can write some proptests for it? One candidate is commutativity of
import/export. On a fresh database importing and then exporting should
yield the same file that was imported provided all flags are turned on.
Candidate for Q1 improvement of import/export.
## About the changes
This metric will expose an aggregated view of how many client
applications are registered in Unleash. Since applications are ephemeral
we are exposing this metric in different time windows based on when the
application was last seen.
The caveat is that we issue a database query for each new range we want
to add. Hopefully, this should not be a problem because:
a) the amount of ranges we'd expose is small and unlikely to grow
b) this is currently updated at startup time and even if we update it on
a scheduled basis the refresh rate will be rather sparse
## Sample data
This is how metrics will look like
```
# HELP client_apps_total Number of registered client apps aggregated by range by last seen
# TYPE client_apps_total gauge
client_apps_total{range="allTime"} 3
client_apps_total{range="30d"} 3
client_apps_total{range="7d"} 2
```
Adds ability to favorite projects.
1. Can favorite project
2. Can unfavorite project
3. Favorite field is returned on `/api/admin/projects/default`
4. Favorite field is returned on` /api/admin/projects`
Previously we hard deleted the users, but due to change requests and
possibly other features in future, we really want to hard-link user
table and have meaningful relationships.
But this means, when user is deleted, all linked data is also deleted.
**Workaround is to soft delete users and just clear users data and keep
the relationships alive for audit logs.**
This PR implements this feature.
## About the changes
Variants are now stored in each environment rather than in the feature
toggle. This enables RBAC, suggest changes, etc to also apply to
variants.
Relates to [roadmap](https://github.com/orgs/Unleash/projects/10) item:
#2254
### Important files
- **src/lib/db/feature-strategy-store.ts** a complex query was moved to
a view named `features_view`
- **src/lib/services/state-service.ts** export version number increased
due to the new format
## Discussion points
We're keeping the old column as a safeguard to be able to go back
Co-authored-by: sighphyre <liquidwicked64@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Christopher Kolstad <chriswk@getunleash.ai>
fix: broken UI when importing features into environments which are not linked to the feature's project
## Related to
- PR: https://github.com/Unleash/unleash/pull/2209
- Issue: https://github.com/Unleash/unleash/issues/2186
- Issue: https://github.com/Unleash/unleash/issues/2193
## Expected behaviour:
After importing we should see:
## About the changes
**The problem:** when we import we have projects, features and
environments. Each feature belongs to a project (this is by default and
the imported file enforces that). The links between projects and
features, or projects and environments, depend on us creating those
relationships. When we add a feature to an environment we're not
validating that the project and the environment are connected. Because
of that, in some situations (like in this test), we can end up with a
project with features but no environment.
This breaks a weak constraint we had which is that all projects should
have at least one environment.
**This PR makes the following assumption when importing**: _if a feature
is added to an environment, and that environment is still not linked to
the project that feature belongs to, then the project and environments
have to be linked_. The rationale behind this is that the user couldn't
have generated this export file without the project and environment
being linked together.
