## About the changes
Some of our metrics are not labeled correctly, one example is
`<base-path>/api/frontend/client/metrics` is labeled as
`/client/metrics`. We can see that in internal-backstage/prometheus:
This issue affects all endpoints that fail to validate the request body.
Also, endpoints that are rejected by the authorization-middleware or the
api-token-middleware are reported as `(hidden)`.
To gain more insights on our api usage but being protective of metrics
cardinality we're prefixing `(hidden)` with some well known base urls:
https://github.com/Unleash/unleash/pull/6400/files#diff-1ed998ca46ffc97c9c0d5d400bfd982dbffdb3004b78a230a8a38e7644eee9b6R17-R33
## How to reproduce:
Make an invalid call to metrics (e.g. stop set to null), then check
/internal-backstage/prometheus and find the 400 error. Expected to be at
`path="/api/client/metrics"` but will have `path=""`:
```shell
curl -H"Authorization: *:development.unleash-insecure-client-api-token" -H'Content-type: application/json' localhost:4242/api/client/metrics -d '{
"appName": "bash-test",
"instanceId": "application-name-dacb1234",
"environment": "development",
"bucket": {
"start": "2023-07-27T11:23:44Z",
"stop": null,
"toggles": {
"myCoolToggle": {
"yes": 25,
"no": 42,
"variants": {
"blue": 6,
"green": 15,
"red": 46
}
},
"myOtherToggle": {
"yes": 0,
"no": 100
}
}
}
}'
```
So, since our assumption about client instances ended up being wrong (or, less than stable).
This PR moves the EdgeUpgradeBanner to be displayed if the featureflag
displayEdgeBanner is enabled. That way, if customers comes back and says
they have upgraded but still get the banner, we can remove them from the
segment.
In order to prevent users from being able to assign roles/permissions
they don't have, this PR adds a check that the user performing the
action either is Admin, Project owner or has the same role they are
trying to grant/add.
This addAccess method is only used from Enterprise, so there will be a
separate PR there, updating how we return the roles list for a user, so
that our frontend can only present the roles a user is actually allowed
to grant.
This adds the validation to the backend to ensure that even if the
frontend thinks we're allowed to add any role to any user here, the
backend can be smart enough to stop it.
We should still update frontend as well, so that it doesn't look like we
can add roles we won't be allowed to.
## About the changes
Our frontend API creates new instances of unleash-client-proxy. Because
this is by-design, we don't want to log a warning that was designed to
warn users about potential misconfiguration of Unleash Proxy.
As an extra, I'm renaming ProxyController to FrontendAPIController to
better reflect the intent of this controller.
## About the changes
This is a rough initial version as a PoC for a permission matrix.
This is only available after enabling the flag `userAccessUIEnabled`
that is set to true by default in local development.
The access was added to the users' admin page but could be embedded in
different contexts (e.g. when assigning a role to a user):
This is how the matrix looks like
---------
Co-authored-by: Nuno Góis <github@nunogois.com>
This PR adds an endpoint to Unleash that accepts an error message and
option error stack and logs it as an error. This allows us to leverage
errors in logs observability to catch UI errors consistently.
Considered a test, but this endpoint only accepts and logs input, so I'm
not sure how useful it would be.
Adds a new Inactive Users list component to admin/users for easier cleanup of users that are counted as inactive: No sign of activity (logins or api token usage) in the last 180 days.
---------
Co-authored-by: David Leek <david@getunleash.io>
In the beginning we used process.nextTick() as a trick to load some data
initally in the constructor of a service.
This is a bad pattern and we should generally avoid any async operations
in the constructor. Today we have two alternatives:
1. Defer loading until data is needed (wrap it in async)
2. Use the schdule-service.
We were sending `user.id` to the service, but if an admin token is used,
there is no `user.id.` Instead, there is
`user.internalAdminTokenUserId`. so we need to use the special method
`extractUserIdFromUser`.
This PR adds this implementation, and now the service correctly
retrieves the appropriate ID for admins.
Related to: https://github.com/Unleash/unleash/pull/5924
Only triggers if there is any rows in client instances that have
sdk_version: unleash-edge with version < 17.0.0
The function that checks this memoizes the check for 10 minutes to avoid
scanning the client instances table too often.
Previously we used a killswitch and returned 404 if the feature was
enabled. This flips that to a default disabled toggle, that has to be
turned on to handle old Edge (pre 17.0.0) posting bulk metrics
This PR will allow us to use a feature flag with variants to control
whether or not we should show the comments field of the feedback form.
This will allow us to see whether we can increase feedback collection if
we reduce the load on the customer.
## About the changes
Whenever we get a call from an admin token we want to associate it with
the [admin token
user](4d42093a07/src/lib/types/core.ts (L34-L41)).
This should give us the needed audit for this type of calls that
currently were lacking a user id (we only stored a string with the token
name in the event log).
We consciously decided not to use `id` as the property to prevent any
unforeseen side effects. The reason is that only `IUser` type has an id
and adding an id to `IApiUser` might lead to confusion.
Since we've now added PAT's we really do recommend switching to those,
or for enterprises, we recommend using service accounts.
Admin tokens have an obvious disadvantage in that they're not connected
to any user, so actions performed by them are harder to audit.
This PR adds a killswitch for turning it off, in preparation for
deprecating them and ultimately removing them in the future.
Lots of work here, mostly because I didn't want to turn off the
`noImplicitAnyLet` lint. This PR tries its best to type all the untyped
lets biome complained about (Don't ask me how many hours that took or
how many lints that was >200...), which in the future will force test
authors to actually type their global variables setup in `beforeAll`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Gastón Fournier <gaston@getunleash.io>
This adds a bulk endpoint under `/api/client/metrics`. Accessible under
`/api/client/metrics/bulk`.
This allows us to piggyback on the need for an API user with access.
This PR mostly copies the behaviour from our `/edge/metrics` endpoint,
but it filters metrics to only include the environment that the token
has access to.
So a client token that has access to the `production` will not be
allowed to report metrics for the `development` environment. More
importantly, a `development` token will not be allowed to post metrics
for the `production` environment.
Related to our work for making Edge bulk metrics a 1st class citizen of
Unleash, this PR adds an X-Unleash-Version header to the response from
client registration.
Based on when we add the new `/api/client/metrics/bulk` endpoint, Edge
can use the response header from upstream to decide whether to post
metrics to `/edge/metrics` or `/api/client/metrics/bulk`.
If the kill switch is enabled unleash returns 404 and a json body explaining why a 404 was given, encouraging users to upgrade to the most recent version of Edge.
We've had a couple of misunderstandings from people surprised that
Unleash allows posts against the `/edge/validate` endpoint without an
API key. It is intentional that this endpoint does not require an
Authorization header, so this PR updates our OpenAPI spec to clarify
that there is no security required for `/edge/validate`
