Fix issues uncovered when reviewing integrations list and form.
- YouTube CSP
- Text content and formatting
- Margins
- Update old integration icons
- Fix headers in dark theme
This PR makes it so that adding a feature naming description when there
is no pattern is disallowed. It also changes the validation for feature
naming slightly so that it can return multiple errors at once.
This was changed a month ago, but it ends up breaking the frontend when
we regenerate the types because the playground needs to have this
structure for now. We'll need to add this back until we can rewrite the
playground to follow the schema.
This PR updates the back-end handling of feature naming patterns to add
implicit leading `^`s and trailing `$`s to the regexes when comparing
them.
It also adds tests for the new behavior, both for new flag names and for
examples.
## Discussion points
Regarding stripping incoming ^ and $: We don't actually need to strip
incoming `^`s and `$`s: it appears that `^^^^^x$$$$$` is just as valid
as `^x$`. As such, we can leave that in. However, if we think it's
better to strip, we can do that too.
Second, I'm considering moving the flag naming validation into a
dedicated module to encapsulate everything a little better. Not sure if
this is the time or where it would live, but open to hearing
suggestions.
This PR adds feature name pattern validation to the import validation
step. When errors occur, they are rendered with all the offending
features, the pattern to match, plus the pattern's description and
example if available.
To achieve this I've added an extra method to the feature toggle service
that checks feature names without throwing errors (because catching `n`
async errors in a loop became tricky and hard to grasp). This method is
also reused in the existing feature name validation method and handles
the feature enabled chcek.
In doing so, I've also added tests to check that the pattern is applied.
Adds `number` as possible payload type for variant.
Adds a flag to enable the feature
Updates all relevant models and schemas
Adds the option to the UI
Closes: #
[1-1357](https://linear.app/unleash/issue/1-1357/support-number-in-variant-payload)
---------
Signed-off-by: andreas-unleash <andreas@getunleash.ai>
## About the changes
Create api token schema can either provide the field `project` or its
plural: `projects` so the joi validation makes them optional:
2be77fb55e/src/lib/schema/api-token-schema.ts (L20-L24)
This means that when returning the token, the response will either
contain `project` or `projects` depending on what was provided as input.
Therefore we need to make both fields optional in the response
The error message only tells the user that the name doesn't match the
pattern. Because we already show the pattern above the input, we don't
need to repeat it in the error message. This makes for a shorter and
more concise message and better UX.
At the same time, for API users, we can keep the more detailed message
that includes info about the pattern, the example, and the description.
This change makes it so that you can save flag naming data on project
creation.
There was a mismatch between flattened and nested data in the creation
endpoint. Likely because we went back and forth a bit when we created
the feature originally.
This PR adds a feature naming pattern description to the project form.
It's rendered as a multi-line input field. The description is also
stored in the db.
This adapts most of @andreas-unleash's PR #4599 with some minor changes
(using description instead of prompt). Actually displaying this data to
the users will come in a later PR.
Does what it says on the tin, should help with cleaning up
https://github.com/Unleash/unleash/pull/4512 and respective schema
changes.
---------
Co-authored-by: Gastón Fournier <gaston@getunleash.io>
## About the changes
We found a problem generating the Go SDK client for the tokens API that
makes use of `oneOf`, combined with `allOf`. The generator doesn't know
how to map this type and leaves it as an object. This PR simplifies the spec and therefore the code generated after it
Adds a first iteration of feature flag naming patterns. Currently behind a flag.
Signed-off-by: andreas-unleash <andreas@getunleash.ai>
Co-authored-by: Thomas Heartman <thomas@getunleash.io>
Co-authored-by: andreas-unleash <andreas@getunleash.ai>
Co-authored-by: Thomas Heartman <thomas@getunleash.ai>
This change sorts the tags in the tags file and tests that the list is
sorted alphabetically. This makes it easier to
find tags in the file.
#4580 already introduced a test to check that we have no duplicate
tags, so this isn't as necessary anymore, but it's still nice to have.
It also removes the previous auto-sorting before exporting. This is to
ensure that entries are sorted in the source list. This might seem like
a regression, but it makes it easier to spot near-duplicate tags:
> Despite having the test that validates there are no duplicates, you
can always have Notifications and Notification API by mistake (tags that
mean the same but are different). Keeping the list alphabetically sorted
might help to prevent this before pushing the change to prod. In this
case, we will eventually find out and fix it, so this could be a good
reason to have the list sorted.
## About the changes
Returns Not Found on create and get project api tokens when given a
project id that doesn't exist
## Discussion points
- This is an extra lookup per execution of the endpoint
## About the changes
At https://github.com/Unleash/unleash/pull/4432 we've introduced the
same tags twice which causes issues when generating the api clients.
Closes #2-1350-fix-openapi-duplicated-tags
## About the changes
Returns either 400 or 404 when token isn't found or doesn't match single
project must be provided projectId criteria
<!-- Does it close an issue? Multiple? -->
Closes #
Linear 2-1003
## Discussion points
<!-- Anything about the PR you'd like to discuss before it gets merged?
Got any questions or doubts? -->
Is projects.length > 1 a 400?
