--- title: "ADR: Use of conditionals in JSX (deprecation of ``)" --- ## Background Using the `&&` operator in React can lead to unexpected rendering behavior when dealing with certain falsy values. In our codebase, the `` component has been used to render React elements based on a boolean condition. However, it has certain drawbacks, which is why we would like to replace it with the ternary operator. ### Pitfalls of `&&` operator While most truthy and falsy values behave as expected with the `&&` operator, certain falsy values can produce unintended outcomes: ```tsx {NaN &&

} // will render `NaN` {0 &&

} // will render `0` {arr?.length &&

} // can render `0` ``` These issues can cause bugs in components that conditionally render UI elements based on numeric values or other potentially falsy conditions. For this reason, we use a wrapper. ```tsx

} /> ``` ### What's wrong with `` While this solves leaking render issues, it has some drawbacks. #### Poor TypeScript support ```tsx import type { FC } from 'react'; import { ConditionallyRender } from 'component/common/ConditionallyRender/ConditionallyRender'; const SubComponent: FC<{ text: string }> = ({ text }) => <>{text}; export const Test: FC<{ maybeString?: string }> = ({ maybeString }) => ( } // ❌ TS Error: Type 'string | undefined' is not assignable to type 'string' // you have to use `maybeString!` here /> ); ``` #### Obfuscation of code smells and code cruft Nested ternaries are easier to spot than nested `` elements. ```tsx
This is bad

} /> )} elseShow={'Should be refactored'} />
``` Nested operator does not look like other JSX components. ```tsx
{a ? ( b ?

This is bad

: null ) : 'Should be refactored'}
``` ## Options considered To avoid these issues, safer alternatives to the `&&` operator can be used: ### **Convert to boolean** We could try to explicitly convert the condition to a boolean, ensuring that only `true` or `false` determine the rendering. ```tsx {Boolean(NaN) &&

} // Won't render anything {!!0 &&

} // Also safe ``` **Unfortunately** Biome (the linter we use) does not include rules to automatically enforce a safer usage of the `&&` operator, as ESLint did. ### Ternary Operator The ternary operator is a more explicit and safer approach. This covers cases where we need to return `null` or `undefined`. ``` tsx {NaN ?

👍

: null} // Won't render anything ``` It also plays nicely with TypeScript. ```tsx export const Test: FC<{ maybeString?: string }> = ({ maybeString }) => maybeString ? : null; ``` This is what we will use from now onwards. ## Consequences Positive: The codebase will become more type-safe and easier to understand. Negative: The `` component is imported in nearly 400 files. Significant refactoring effort is required. Performance: There was no measurable performance difference between code with and without this component. This was tested on production bundle, on the features search (table) and projects list pages. ## Migration plan 1. Mark `` as deprecated in the codebase with a clear JSDoc comment. 2. Automated refactoring with AST (Abstract Syntax Tree): There already is a script developed that can convert files between `ConditionallyRender` and ternary syntax. It uses jscodeshift, a library. It will be put in `frontend/scripts/transform.js`. 3. Each change will have to be reviewed. The order of refactoring should be: 1. New features that are behind feature flags. 2. Non-critical or not in demand pages, like new signals or feedback component. 3. Less complex pages, for example in `/src/component/admin`. 4. More complex and critical pages, like strategy editing. 5. Utilities and components used in many places (`/src/component/common`). 4. Once all instances of `` have been refactored, remove the component from the codebase.