This PR adds more tests to check a few more cases for the lifecycle
calculation query. Specifically, it tests that:
- If we don't have any data for a stage, we return `null`.
- We filter on projects
- It correctly takes `0` days into account when calculating averages.
This PR adds a project lifecycle read model file along with the most
important (and most complicated) query that runs with it: calculating
the average time spent in each stage.
The calculation relies on the following:
- when calculating the average of a stage, only flags who have gone into
a following stage are taken into account.
- we'll count "next stage" as the next row for the same feature where
the `created_at` timestamp is higher than the current row
- if you skip a stage (go straight to live or archived, for instance),
that doesn't matter, because we don't look at that.
The UI only shows the time spent in days, so I decided to go with
rounding to days directly in the query.
## Discussion point:
This one uses a subquery, but I'm not sure it's possible to do without
it. However, if it's too expensive, we can probably also cache the value
somehow, so it's not calculated more than every so often.
Due to our use of docusaurus and the openapi plugin we need to allow
Artistic-2.0, Having read the license, it allows for free use of the
licensed code, provided the license is included when distributing, but
does not require a relicensing of products using the licensed code.
Fixes browser console warnings and errors related to the event timeline
and strategy form.
- **Event Timeline**: Addressed a warning where the environment filter
rendered with a default environment value (production) before
environments were fully loaded.
- **Strategy Form**: Resolved an error caused by forwarding the enabled
prop as a boolean.
<!-- Thanks for creating a PR! To make it easier for reviewers and
everyone else to understand what your changes relate to, please add some
relevant content to the headings below. Feel free to ignore or delete
sections that you don't think are relevant. Thank you! ❤️ -->
## About the changes
Update A/B testing use cases tutorial. [Preview
link](https://unleash-docs-git-use-case-ab-testing-v2-unleash-team.vercel.app/feature-flag-tutorials/use-cases/a-b-testing)
<!-- Does it close an issue? Multiple? -->
Closes #
<!-- (For internal contributors): Does it relate to an issue on public
roadmap? -->
<!--
Relates to [roadmap](https://github.com/orgs/Unleash/projects/10) item:
#
-->
### Important files
<!-- PRs can contain a lot of changes, but not all changes are equally
important. Where should a reviewer start looking to get an overview of
the changes? Are any files particularly important? -->
## Discussion points
<!-- Anything about the PR you'd like to discuss before it gets merged?
Got any questions or doubts? -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Michael Ferranti <michael.ferranti+unleash@getunleash.io>
Co-authored-by: Melinda Fekete <melinda.fekete@getunleash.io>
Add rough implementation of the lifecycle summary components.
This PR adds components for all the different lifecycle stages. We don't
have any data yet, so they're all hardcoded for now, just to get the
visuals right. I'm expecting the lines of code to drop and to
refactor/extract some structures as development continues.
For now, this is what they look like:
Things to note:
- The lifecycle stage icon colors don't match up with the sketches, but
they match up with what we currently have in the app. If we change them,
we should change them together.
- This implementation does not contain the "Flag lifecycle" header or
the "view graphs" link.
This change introduces a new method `countProjectTokens` on the
`IApiTokenStore` interface. It also swaps out the manual filtering for
api tokens belonging to a project in the project status service.
This change opens up the project segments page to OSS users. They
could navigate to it explicitly before, but would be told it was a
premium feature (which it is not (since 5.5)).
After this, it'll show up in the settings sidebar as for
pro/enterprise, and you'll get the actual segments table instead of
"this is a premium feature" message.
Do not count stale flags as potentially stale flags to remove
duplicates.
Stale flags feel like more superior state and it should not show up
under potentially stale.
This PR adds member, api token, and segment counts to the project status
payload. It updates the schemas and adds the necessary stores to get
this information. It also adds a new query to the segments store for
getting project segments.
I'll add tests in a follow-up.
We found an issue where we'd get a minified react error referencing the
LazyProjectExport component.
We suspect that the issue might be the conditional rendering of this
component, so the fix is to always render it, but to use the flag to
check whether we should show the count or not.
As part of the release plan template work. This PR adds the three events
for actions with the templates.
Actually activating milestones should probably trigger existing
FeatureStrategyAdd events when adding and FeatureStrategyRemove when
changing milestones.
Addressing some oversights that led to browser console errors.
This PR fixes console errors related to the recently introduced
highlight component (#8643) and tag row component in the new flag
metadata panel (#8663).
This PR wires up the connectedenvironments data from the API to the
resources widget.
Additionally, it adjusts the orval schema to add the new
connectedEnvironments property, and adds a loading state indicator for
the resource values based on the project status endpoint response.
As was discussed in a previous PR, I think this is a good time to update
the API to include all the information required for this view. This
would get rid of three hooks, lots of loading state indicators (because
we **can** do them individually; check out
0a334f9892)
and generally simplify this component a bit.
Here's the loading state:
This change adds a few small bits of styling to the status modal to
get us going. It:
- adds padding to the whole modal
- adds a row for the health and resources widgets
- add project health placeholder
It leaves the project activity widget alone for now.
it makes the modal look like this:
In some cases, people want to disable database migration. For example,
some people or companies want to grant whole permissions to handle the
schema by DBAs, not by application level hence I use
`parseEnvVarBoolean` to handle `disableMigration` option by environment
variable. I set the default value as `false` for the backward
compatibility.
**Issue fix:** Resolves#8618, where environments were incorrectly
appended to the route.
**Change:** Introduces `ossPath` specifically for OSS users, as OSS
lacks the default `/settings` path, starting instead from `api-access`.
This PR adds connected environments to the project status payload.
It's done by:
- adding a new `getConnectedEnvironmentCountForProject` method to the
project store (I opted for this approach instead of creating a new view
model because it already has a `getEnvironmentsForProject` method)
- adding the project store to the project status service
- updating the schema
For the schema, I opted for adding a `resources` property, under which I
put `connectedEnvironments`. My thinking was that if we want to add the
rest of the project resources (that go in the resources widget), it'd
make sense to group those together inside an object. However, I'd also
be happy to place the property on the top level. If you have opinions
one way or the other, let me know.
As for the count, we're currently only counting environments that have
metrics and that are active for the current project.
