Archived features can be searched now.
This is the backend and small parts of frontend preparing to add
filters, buttons etc in next PR.
---------
Co-authored-by: Thomas Heartman <thomas@getunleash.io>
Tracking events for
1. Onboarding started/project created
2. Onboarding finishes
3. API token generated
4. Sdk example clicked
Not tracking events that can happen multiple times and results are
skewed
1. Moving between onboarding steps
1. Now the dialog will not close when SDK got connected
2. It will start to show the suggested production code. ( this will be
attached in next PR)
3. Also, it has connected indicator on the right
4. Back button is removed in this stage.
---------
Co-authored-by: Tymoteusz Czech <2625371+Tymek@users.noreply.github.com>
After we implemented new feature flag creation flow, this are not used
anymore.
Creation is now handled by **CreateFeatureDialog**.
Also edit component can be minified, because it does not need so many
fields anymore.
There's a bug where the UI will fetch all features every time you load a
project screen (including every time you filter the project results).
The reason is that the create flag dialog was rendered (just not open)
every time. To solve it, we instead wrap it in an extra component that
prevents all the fetching and setup from running when the dialog isn't
open.
Additionally, we'll lower the page size for the global fetch limit to 1,
so that we send less data.
Extracts the Avatar Group component into a `common` component and adds a
standard tooltip to all avatars.
Relates to linear issue 1-2606
This is a suggestion / proof of concept for how we can solve it. While I
think we can merge this as is, I'd also be happy to take any discussions
on other ways to approach it etc.
## Why are these changes made together?
Because extracting the avatar group without adding the new tooltip data
made the existing tooltip misbehave (it'd show up in the top left of the
screen, not synced to the avatar in any way).
I probably could have (and still can if you think it's prudent) split it
out such that the avatar gets a standardized tooltip first (and disable
it for the group card avatars), and split out the avatars in a
follow-up. Happy to do that if you think it's better.
## What does this mean?
It used to be that we had no consistent way of dealing with avatars and
tooltips. Some places had them, some places didn't. This change makes it
so that all avatars that we can show tooltips for will get the same
tooltip.
Previously, we had at least 4 different ways of dealing with tooltips:
- The HTML tooltip (that would be standardized with this PR) in the
project flags table
- The "title" that you'd get on your user avatar
- The group card list tooltip
- And sometimes you'd get nothing at all
with this change, we'll always show the same kind of tooltip if we can:
## What goes in the tooltip?
We use the `UserAvatar` component for a fair few different things and I
didn't want to extract separate components for all the different use
cases. Instead, I wanted to get an overview over what we use it for and
what is relevant info to show.
I found all the places we used it and tried to form an opinion.
This tooltip will work with a user's email, name, username, and id. If
there is no user (such as for empty avatars and avatars displaying only
"+n" for remaining members), we show no tooltip.
Following the example set by the group card avatars, we'll try to use
email or username (in that order) as the main bit of text. If the user
has an email or a username and also a name, the name will be used as
secondary text.
If the user does not have an email or username, but has a name, we'll
use the name as the main text.
If the user does not have an email, a username, or a name, we'll try to
show "User ID: N" if they have an id.
If they do not have a username, a name, an email, or an ID, we bail out
and show nothing.
## Why can you disable the tooltip?
In some cases, you might want to disable the tooltip because you have
more information to feed into it. An example of that is in the project
flags table, where we want to show more information in cases where the
user is 'unknown':
## Additional fixes
This PR also adds a few lines of CSS to fix a minor avatar layout bug.
Before:
After:
This change fixes a bug where editors were suddenly unable to create
flags. The issue is that the new project creation dialog used a
permission button, but didn't supply the project ID.
This PR updates the text used to describe the different fields used in
the new creation dialog.
It also removes a redundant aria attribute (that MUI already handles).
This change prevents long project names from blowing the form out of
proportion.
To do so, it:
1. sets `whitespace: no-wrap` on the button labels. Judging by the other
styles, this was the intention all along, but it didn't really come up
until now.
2. It also sets the label width for projects to 30ch,so that you'll get
to see quite a bit of the project name before it gets cut off.
It would be possible to set a dynamic width for this button based on the
longest project name, but I'm not sure it adds much value, so I'm
leaning towards keeping it simple.
Here's what the dynamic width would look like:
``` tsx
const projectButtonLabelWidth = useMemo(() => {
const longestProjectName = projects.reduce(
(prev: number, type: { name: string }) =>
prev >= type.name.length ? prev : type.name.length,
0,
);
return `${Math.min(longestProjectName, 30)}ch`;
}, [projects]);
```
What it looks like:
This PR makes the config dropdown list generic over its values, so that
you can pass stuff that isn't strings.
It also updates the existing impression data button to use booleans
instead.
This change makes it so that we show the name of the project that is
selected on the selection button instead of the ID. There is a chance
that the name is not unique, but I'm willing to take that risk (plus
it's how we do it today).
I've used a useMemo for this, because we have to scan through a list
to find the right project. Sure, it's always a small list (less than
500 items, I should think), but still nice to avoid doing it every
render. Happy to remove it if you think it obfuscates something.
We *could* also use a `useState` hook and initialize it with the right
value, update when it changes, but I actually think this is a better
option (requires less code and less "remember to update this when that
changes").
