## About the changes
When inserting a user with an invalid role id, the user creation will
succeed but there will be no record in the audit log.
The API call returns a 400 misleading you to believe the user was not
created, but it actually was.
This makes the whole user creation transactional, so if something fails,
data will be in the right state.
## Testing
The e2e test was split in 2 scenarios, one with smtp and another one
without.
This test was added, and it was failing before adding the transaction,
because when fetching the users, the user was there, despite having
returned a 400 error in the API call:
80a2e65b6f/src/test/e2e/api/admin/user-admin.e2e.test.ts (L181-L204)
Updates a few remaining places where we check constraint operators with
the new constraint operator checks. Additionally, because there was only
one remaining place where we used the `oneOf` function, I replaced it
with a normal `includes` check and deleted the `oneOf` util. From what I
can tell, there's no need to have that utility function; it doesn't
provide much benefit over using the language built-ins 🤷🏼
Doesn't clear the value from the constraint input value popover if you
close it and then re-open. In other words, if you accidentally click
out, you don't lose your progress. Instead, the popover will open again,
with the value you had when you closed it highlighted (so that it's easy
to type over if you want to):
<img width="452" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d86aa00e-4956-40a8-8fea-e75be5d5425b"
/>
The reason I'm changing this now is because I noticed that the error
wasn't cleared correctly when the popover was closed. If we do it this
way instead, then that makes sense, because you can still see the value.
This is also how the single-value popover has worked forever.
From some quick testing, the single value popover still works as
expected:
<img width="562" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9041a922-b055-4310-ab60-93ad219981a4"
/>
As a side note: I'm adding a comment to anyone coming after as to why
focus handling on escape doesn't work correctly on the single value
button. I was about to go down a rabbit hole on that before I read my
own comment on the previous PR. So I thought I'd put that here too.
Makes it so that the constraint value input gives you an error if you
try to add one or more values that **all** exist in the set of values
already. E.g. if you have `a` and `b`, and try to add `a`, it'll tell
you that "`a` has already been added". Likewise, if you try to add
`a,b`, it'll tell you that all these values already exist. However, if
at least one of the values does not exist, then it will allow you to
submit the values (we already do deduplication before storing anyway).
The background for this is that a user was confused thinking that just
one specific value didn't get added to their constraints. As it turns
out, they'd already added the value previously, so when it didn't show
up at the end of the list, they thought it didn't work at all.
<img width="863" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/12195e0a-04bc-4b41-bd44-432120c768a6"
/>
<img width="816" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/433a64d7-aec0-482d-8544-574656c266ce"
/>
---------
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR updates how we show old/new strategy/segment names in change
requests, and also removes the name of the strategy type from the
change.
For the old/new names: instead of showing them stacked vertically, we
show them side by side (old name first, then new name).
Compare before:
<img width="967" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d3e36f49-4abc-4cd4-8ba9-752515740185"
/>
with after:
<img width="974" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d0f85264-b055-4c44-b985-f992f09d8dab"
/>
Only affects the new components (legacy CR view is untouched). If we get
negative feedback while rolling it out because the strat type name is
missing, we can always add it back.
The max width is set to `max(40vw, 1000px)`, so that if you're on a very
wide window, then it'll take up at most 40% of the horizontal space.
Once your window is smaller than 2500px, however, the sidebar will stop
shrinking and stay at 1000px (or as close to that as the window allows).
It'll keep shrinking with the window size.
This came up because in certain cases, such as if you have a release
template with a long description, the modal would just keep growing
until it took up 98% of the window width.
I have not set a min width for now. I don't think there is any need for
it, but if we find there is, we can add it back later.
Before:
After:
I noticed event search, as it is doing `ILIKE` search, is slow
sometimes. Lets get some statistics about it.
Meanwhile added timers for other interesting queries.
Adds "change:" to the beginning of all changes and does some work to
align the use of compononents and structure across them (supersedes
https://github.com/Unleash/unleash/pull/10260).
In doing so, I have also added new and legacy variants for all different
change components, because this has required some hierarchy
restructuring every now and then. A reason for doing that was adding the
correct wrapping behavior for components, such that on smaller screens,
we wouldn't entirely blow out and make the kebab menu invisible and
inaccessible.
It also makes it so that we switch to full-width change view earlier (at
breakpoint md instead of sm), because at sm, a lot of stuff got hidden
before we switched to full-width.
Most changes are trivial updates; I've called out bits of the code that
are not in comments.
Rendered, it looks like this:
<img width="1203" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/36bed974-99da-4d8d-a881-ea9df7797210"
/>
One interesting and potentially quite useful side-effect, is that all
change types now use the exact same set of components in the same
fashion, as evidenced by this screenie where I've added outlines to the
hierarchy:
<img width="1020" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/685fefcc-af7e-4697-b8f3-8260af1e2a84"
/>
The one difference is that components without a diff place the "more"
kebab menu one layer further inside to facilitate prettier wrapping (the
kebab menu can stay on the same line as the other text when wrapping):
<img width="238" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2b8d3174-06a8-4ad4-b366-cea97720deda"
/>
Removes the view diff hover links (and strategy icons) in the new views
and removes trailing colons.
In removing the hover links, I have split up the content of their files
(`StrategyTooltipLink` and `SegmentTooltipLink`) into
`Change{Segment|Strategy}Name` and `{Segment|Strategy}Diff`. I have
reverted the existing tooltip files to their state before I began
changing this and added deprecation notices. These old tooltips are only
used by the old components, so we don't need to work on them after all.
In doing this work, I've also updated the strategy change diff to handle
the new functionality (tabs instead of hover)
The removal of the trailing colons (so that it's `adding strategy
gradual rollout` instead of `adding strategy: gradual rollout` is in
preparation for the remaining changes to the header that we're
introducing with this change. The removal of these is not behind a flag,
so I've also done it in the legacy components. This feels like a very
low risk change, so it felt like more work to have to check a flag for
each of the different instances where we use it.
<img width="839" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b29b8073-c282-4b4b-948f-9a545082ac31"
/>
