This adds documentation to the RBAC section on how to use root roles on
groups and updates a few screenshots for the group pages.
---------
Co-authored-by: Thomas Heartman <thomas@getunleash.ai>
# Simplify package scripts
This PR's purpose is to raise a discussion surrounding our current
package scripts.
It includes some suggestions that aim to simplify the scripts and
hopefully bring a much more straightforward approach to developing and
contributing to Unleash.
Building (prod) should only happen **explicitly** and when needed.
## Before PR (current behavior)
- Clone the project;
- Open 2 terminals: One for `unleash` and another for
`unleash/frontend`;
- On `unleash`:
- Run `yarn` (which will also build, for some reason?);
- Run `yarn start:dev` to start backend in dev mode (`tsc-watch`);
- On `unleash/frontend`:
- Run `yarn` (which will also build, for some reason?);
- Run `yarn start` to start frontend in dev mode (`vite`);
So it seems to me like we build unnecessarily every time we install
dependencies. Neither dev scripts need to build the project, as backend
uses `tsc-watch` and frontend uses `vite`. I'm unsure why this is the
case, as building can take a very long time.
There's also some complexity in the way we need to split the terminal to
`cd` into `frontend` and treat it as a different project. The fact that
we have different script names is also confusing (`yarn start`, `yarn
start:dev`, etc).
## After PR
- Clone the project;
- Run `yarn` to install all dependencies;
- Run `yarn dev` to get started developing Unleash;
Running `yarn` should take care of everything needed to start
developing. This includes installing dependencies for frontend as well.
It should not build projects if we are not being explicit about it,
especially since we don't need to build them at this stage.
Running `yarn dev` should start the project in dev mode. This means
running both projects in `dev` mode, which for `backend` means running
`tsc-watch` and for `frontend` means running `vite`.
Here this PR attempts to provide a better DX by using
[concurrently](https://www.npmjs.com/package/concurrently) and
[wait-on](https://www.npmjs.com/package/wait-on) - This means both tasks
are ran simultaneously, stdout is labeled accordingly, and are stopped
together. It also means that `frontend` waits for `backend` to be
serving at `4242` before starting, since `frontend` starts pretty much
immediately with `vite` and `backend` takes a bit longer. Of course,
when the `backend` is hot-reloading you may still find some
`ECONNREFUSED`s on `frontend` stdout while it recompiles.
No more splitting your terminal and treating `frontend` as a separate
project.
## Discussion points
Maybe there's a better alternative to `tsc-watch`? I briefly explored
some alternatives and while they had a much faster starting speed,
hot-reload was sometimes slower. IMO we should aspire to run
`src/server-dev.ts` directly and only compile when needed.
Running `dev:backend` still serves a version of the frontend (at 4242).
**Why? Can we remove that behavior?**
I can't imagine a scenario in dev where we wouldn't want to run the
latest version of the frontend with `vite`.
~~**Note:** This PR removes all other out-of-scope scripts to focus on
this revamp. If we decide to merge it, we should evaluate what other
existing scripts we still want to include. May be a good opportunity to
clean up unused ones and only include the ones we really use. This
includes scripts that our GH actions rely on.~~
**Update:** In an effort to minimize impact surface of this PR and make
it a bit more ready for merging:
- It updates some docs in
2a4ff805e8
and
1bbc488251
to reflect our new simplified flow;
- It includes the old package scripts for now in
039bc04699;
- It updates some of our GH actions to reflect the new scripts in
7782cb9b12;
Given its current status I'll promote the PR to "ready for review".
I still think we should have a second look at our existing scripts and
GH actions to see what we really need and/or should adapt, but it should
be a team effort so we have a broader context. Maybe on a follow-up PR.
Does this require any changes to related projects (e.g. Enterprise)?
---------
Co-authored-by: Gastón Fournier <gaston@getunleash.io>
### What
Since 3ed4aeba5c, we've updated the
segment limits and added separate limits for pro and enterprise. This PR
updates the docs with the new limits.
---------
Co-authored-by: Thomas Heartman <thomas@getunleash.ai>
## About the changes
Update documentation to the minimum version of node. This was already
updated in other parts of the documentation
---------
Co-authored-by: Thomas Heartman <thomas@getunleash.io>
### What
We've had this marked as deprecated through our v4, this PR removes it.
### Worth noting
This updates the deprecation notices with removal notices in the
documentation as well.
### Considerations
The tags API is still located under
/api/admin/features/{featureName}/tags. It should be moved to
/api/admin/projects/{project}/features/{featureName}/tags. I vote we do
that in a separate PR, we'd probably also need to deprecate the existing
tags endpoints for v5 and remove in v6. We could use 308s to signify
that they are moved.
---------
Co-authored-by: Thomas Heartman <thomas@getunleash.ai>
## About the changes
Make it explicit that eventHook is no longer an option in v5, the
migration should be to
https://docs.getunleash.io/reference/addons/webhook which is already
linked in the docs since v4
<!-- Thanks for creating a PR! To make it easier for reviewers and
everyone else to understand what your changes relate to, please add some
relevant content to the headings below. Feel free to ignore or delete
sections that you don't think are relevant. Thank you! ❤️ -->
Adds `mode` and `defaultStickiness` to the project form.
Adds a new img
## About the changes
<!-- Describe the changes introduced. What are they and why are they
being introduced? Feel free to also add screenshots or steps to view the
changes if they're visual. -->
<!-- Does it close an issue? Multiple? -->
Closes #
<!-- (For internal contributors): Does it relate to an issue on public
roadmap? -->
<!--
Relates to [roadmap](https://github.com/orgs/Unleash/projects/10) item:
#
-->
### Important files
<!-- PRs can contain a lot of changes, but not all changes are equally
important. Where should a reviewer start looking to get an overview of
the changes? Are any files particularly important? -->
## Discussion points
<!-- Anything about the PR you'd like to discuss before it gets merged?
Got any questions or doubts? -->
---------
Signed-off-by: andreas-unleash <andreas@getunleash.ai>
Co-authored-by: Thomas Heartman <thomas@getunleash.ai>
## About the changes
Update `passord` documentation with `password`. Note this was not a typo
but just Norwegian:
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english-norwegian/password
```shell
grep passord * -R -l | grep -v .git | grep -v dist | grep -v v3 | xargs sed -i 's/passord/password/g'
```
The script above avoids updating v3 because of legacy reasons
Related to #1265
<!-- Thanks for creating a PR! To make it easier for reviewers and
everyone else to understand what your changes relate to, please add some
relevant content to the headings below. Feel free to ignore or delete
sections that you don't think are relevant. Thank you! ❤️ -->
New PR using correct prefixes
## About the changes
<!-- Describe the changes introduced. What are they and why are they
being introduced? Feel free to also add screenshots or steps to view the
changes if they're visual. -->
Adds documentation to the docs website for the new Jira Cloud plugin.
Couple of pieces on install page are missing due to the nature of having
to have the docs before we can start the review process after which
we'll get the final details on how/where to install/from etc.
Also a couple of pending fixes that might impact screenshots/warrant new
ones made
<!-- (For internal contributors): Does it relate to an issue on public
roadmap? -->
Relates to [roadmap](https://github.com/orgs/Unleash/projects/10) item:
#2952
### Important files
<!-- PRs can contain a lot of changes, but not all changes are equally
important. Where should a reviewer start looking to get an overview of
the changes? Are any files particularly important? -->
- website/docs/reference/integrations/jira-cloud-plugin-installation.md
- website/docs/reference/integrations/jira-cloud-plugin-usage.md
## Discussion points
<!-- Anything about the PR you'd like to discuss before it gets merged?
Got any questions or doubts? -->
Very open to improvements on wording and tips on standards used in
screenshots
---------
Co-authored-by: Simon Hornby <liquidwicked64@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Thomas Heartman <thomas@getunleash.ai>
This PR adds an explainer document about using large/complex
constraints, inspired by the Unleash and Redis repo.
The intent is to create a comprehensive and understandable explanation
as to why we don't recommend you do this, and also to offer alternative
solutions for the same problem.
---------
Co-authored-by: Simon Hornby <liquidwicked64@gmail.com>
<!-- Thanks for creating a PR! To make it easier for reviewers and
everyone else to understand what your changes relate to, please add some
relevant content to the headings below. Feel free to ignore or delete
sections that you don't think are relevant. Thank you! ❤️ -->
[Previous PR (has the
comments)](https://github.com/Unleash/unleash/pull/3405)
## About the changes
<!-- Describe the changes introduced. What are they and why are they
being introduced? Feel free to also add screenshots or steps to view the
changes if they're visual. -->
<!-- Does it close an issue? Multiple? -->
Closes #
<!-- (For internal contributors): Does it relate to an issue on public
roadmap? -->
<!--
Relates to [roadmap](https://github.com/orgs/Unleash/projects/10) item:
#
-->
### Important files
<!-- PRs can contain a lot of changes, but not all changes are equally
important. Where should a reviewer start looking to get an overview of
the changes? Are any files particularly important? -->
## Discussion points
<!-- Anything about the PR you'd like to discuss before it gets merged?
Got any questions or doubts? -->
---------
Signed-off-by: andreas-unleash <andreas@getunleash.ai>
Co-authored-by: Thomas Heartman <thomas@getunleash.ai>
<!-- Thanks for creating a PR! To make it easier for reviewers and
everyone else to understand what your changes relate to, please add some
relevant content to the headings below. Feel free to ignore or delete
sections that you don't think are relevant. Thank you! ❤️ -->
## About the changes
<!-- Describe the changes introduced. What are they and why are they
being introduced? Feel free to also add screenshots or steps to view the
changes if they're visual. -->
Update to Python compatibility table.
* Impression events supported in v5.6.0.
([Docs](https://docs.getunleash.io/unleash-client-python/eventcallbacks.html))
* Bootstrapping from files and custom boostrapping has been supported
since v5.2.0.
([Docs](https://docs.getunleash.io/unleash-client-python/filecache.html)
&
[Docs](https://docs.getunleash.io/unleash-client-python/customcache.html))
<!-- Does it close an issue? Multiple? -->
Closes #
<!-- (For internal contributors): Does it relate to an issue on public
roadmap? -->
<!--
Relates to [roadmap](https://github.com/orgs/Unleash/projects/10) item:
#
-->
### Important files
<!-- PRs can contain a lot of changes, but not all changes are equally
important. Where should a reviewer start looking to get an overview of
the changes? Are any files particularly important? -->
## Discussion points
<!-- Anything about the PR you'd like to discuss before it gets merged?
Got any questions or doubts? -->
<!-- Thanks for creating a PR! To make it easier for reviewers and
everyone else to understand what your changes relate to, please add some
relevant content to the headings below. Feel free to ignore or delete
sections that you don't think are relevant. Thank you! ❤️ -->
## About the changes
<!-- Describe the changes introduced. What are they and why are they
being introduced? Feel free to also add screenshots or steps to view the
changes if they're visual. -->
<!-- Does it close an issue? Multiple? -->
Closes #
<!-- (For internal contributors): Does it relate to an issue on public
roadmap? -->
<!--
Relates to [roadmap](https://github.com/orgs/Unleash/projects/10) item:
#
-->
### Important files
<!-- PRs can contain a lot of changes, but not all changes are equally
important. Where should a reviewer start looking to get an overview of
the changes? Are any files particularly important? -->
## Discussion points
<!-- Anything about the PR you'd like to discuss before it gets merged?
Got any questions or doubts? -->
---------
Signed-off-by: andreas-unleash <andreas@getunleash.ai>
This PR changes the syntax highlighting theme we use in the docs. The
reason for the change is that the previous theme we used didn't have
sufficient color contrast between its comment strings and its
background.
## Options
I decided to use the Oceanic Next color theme that is included with
docusaurus. Looking through, the only other dark theme that also passed
AA contrast checks was VS Dark. The reason I picked Oceanic over VS Dark
is simply that I like it better.
For demonstration, here's what the Oceanic theme looks like:
And here's the VS Dark theme:
## Bonus change
The PR also includes a fix to render a pricing admonition correctly.
It's not related to the PR, but I noticed it rendered incorrectly while
I was working on it.
This PR updates the docs to clarify that we don't support multi-host
strings in the databaseUrl configuration variable.
The docs used to just mention that we accept libpq strings, but as
reported in #3221, we **don't** support multi-host strings.
I did some digging and found that this is because [node-postgres -- the
library we use to connect to postgres -- itself does not support
multi-host
strings](https://github.com/brianc/node-postgres/issues/2308).
To fix this, we would need to replace the library we use or otherwise
wrap it. While this would be a better long-term solution, we don't have
the capacity to it right now. But we can update the docs to better
reflect reality.
## About the changes
- Updates the segment information on top to be clearer - No longer an
experimental feature, but we do have some limits in place;
- Also updates the documentation to better reflect this;
Co-authored-by: @thomasheartman
---------
Co-authored-by: Thomas Heartman <thomas@getunleash.ai>
Co-authored-by: Gastón Fournier <gaston@getunleash.ai>
This change does two things:
It clarifies that the permissions listed in the guide are permissions
needed to perform all the steps in the guide, and not the permissions
needed to create a feature.
Separates the project-level and environment-level permissions needed
into separate sublists.
This change updates the "change requests permissions" section of the
change request doc to explicitly call out a few things we've seen
confusion around recently.
These are:
- project owners can't approve/apply change requests. You must create
custom roles
- viewers can create change requests. This is intentional
- skip change requests only works via the API
It also:
- elaborates a little on the circumventing change requests section to
clarify how it works.
- adds the change requests project roles to the project roles list. This
section should be kept up to date with all the relevant roles that exist
for projects.
## About the changes
Documentation about feature toggle variants per environment
## Discussion points
The version when this will be available is still to be defined.
---------
Co-authored-by: Thomas Heartman <thomas@getunleash.ai>
## What & why
This update does three things:
1. Adjusts the environment cloning feature availability notice: because
this has been released.
2. Updates the availability notice for environments (to conform with the
standard docusaurus way of doing things): for consistency
3. Add a brief explanation of environment types: because this isn't
documented anywhere
## Sources
The note about how environment types work is sourced from this old
[slack thread (internal to the
team)](https://unleash-community.slack.com/archives/G01MU2Q49QC/p1659600175175769)
This PR expands upon the docs in the original PR (and thus supersedes #3139)
It contains the docs for the recent network view feature.
Closes#2603
---------
Co-authored-by: Gastón Fournier <gaston@getunleash.io>
Co-authored-by: Gastón Fournier <gaston@getunleash.ai>
## What
Adds environment variable equivalents for remaining authentication
options.
Also reformats the list silghtly.
## Why
Because the `AUTH_TYPE` and `AUTH_ENABLE_API_TOKEN` variables hadn't
been previously mentioned and we get questions about this from time to
time.
The reformat is primarily for using `monospace font` where appropriate.
## What
This change removes the "unleash proxy" column from the SDK compat
table.
## Why
Because the proxy isn't technically an SDK. Having the column there can
be misleading to users.
In the latest case, a user pointed out that the table says the proxy
supports `isEnabled` with fallback values, but that there is no way to
use this via the API (or via client-side sdks) at the moment.
I think we should add a section to the proxy doc about its capabilities
instead.
In fact, I think we should do the same thing with the proxy that we did
with the SDKs: merge the docs.getunleash content with the github readme
and instead source it from there.
## About the changes
This makes response time with app names enabled for everyone but also
kept a way of turning it off (kill switch) in case it cause some issues
because of misconfigured app names
## What
This PR adds a note to the constraint and the segment docs about using a
large number of constraint values.
## Why
This is a fairly common question in slack, and there is no clear
documentation around this at the moment. As such, it's likely that
people do this a fair bit without telling us. We don't think this is the
right approach, so adding this bit of documentation should hopefully
make it a little clearer.
## What
The main purpose of this PR is to
1. Delete the proxy docs in this repo and replace them with the proxy's
GitHub readme.
2. Add the docs for Unleash Edge.
### Detailed change description
This PR contains a lot of small changes in a large number of files. To
make it easier to get an overview, here's a detailed description of what
happens where:
#### In the `website/docs`directory
Except for the deletion of the proxy doc, all changes in this directory
are rewriting internal links, so that they point to the newly generated
document instead.
#### `package.json` and `yarn.lock`
When including the documentation for Edge, we also want to render the
mermaid diagrams it uses. Docusaurus supports this via a plugin. All
changes in these files are related to installing that plugin.
#### `docusaurus.config.js`
There's two types of changes in this file:
1. Mermaid-related changes: we ask docusaurus to render mermaid in
markdown files and add the plugin
2. Document generation. There's some rewrites to the sdk doc generation
plus an entirely new section that generates docs for Edge and the proxy
#### `sidebars.js`
Two things:
1. Add the edge docs
2. Move both the Edge and the proxy docs up a level, so that they're
directly under "reference docs" instead of nested inside "unleash
concepts".
#### In the `website/remote-content` directory
These are the remote content files. Previously, all of this lived only
in a `readme-fns.js` file, but with the introduction of Edge and proxy
docs, this has been moved into its own directory and refactored into
three files (`shared`, `sdks`, `edge-proxy`).
#### `custom.css`
Style updates to center mermaid diagrams and provide more space around
them.
#### In `static/img`
The image files that were included in the proxy doc and that have been
deleted.
## Why
For two reasons:
1. Reduce duplication for the proxy. Have one source of truth.
2. Add docs for edge.
## Discussion points and review wishes
This is a big PR, and I don't expect anyone to do a line-by-line review
of it, nor do I think that is particularly useful. Instead, I'd like to
ask reviewers to:
1. Visit the [documentation
preview](https://unleash-docs-git-docs-source-proxy-gh-unleash-team.vercel.app/reference/unleash-proxy)
and have a look at both the proxy docs and the Edge docs. Potentially
have a look at the SDK docs too to verify that everything still works.
2. Consider whether they think moving the proxy and edge docs up a level
(in the sidebar) makes sense.
3. Let me know what slug they'd prefer for the Edge docs. I've gone with
`unleash-edge` for now (so that it's
`docs.getunleash.io/reference/unleash-edge`), but we could potentially
also just use `edge`. WDYT?
4. Read through the detailed changes section.
5. Let me know if they have any other concerns or questions.
## Screenies
The new proxy doc:
The new edge doc:
## About the changes
This PR prepares the GA of service accounts: OpenAPI tags, documentation
and flag removal
Relates to [roadmap](https://github.com/orgs/Unleash/projects/10) item:
#2942
---------
Co-authored-by: Nuno Góis <github@nunogois.com>
