[](https://renovatebot.com)
This PR contains the following updates:
| Package | Type | Update | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
|
[docker/build-push-action](https://togithub.com/docker/build-push-action)
| action | major | `v5` -> `v6` |
---
### Release Notes
<details>
<summary>docker/build-push-action (docker/build-push-action)</summary>
###
[`v6`](https://togithub.com/docker/build-push-action/compare/v5...v6)
[Compare
Source](https://togithub.com/docker/build-push-action/compare/v5...v6)
</details>
---
### Configuration
📅 **Schedule**: Branch creation - "after 7pm every weekday,before 5am
every weekday" in timezone Europe/Madrid, Automerge - At any time (no
schedule defined).
🚦 **Automerge**: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you
are satisfied.
♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the
rebase/retry checkbox.
🔕 **Ignore**: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update
again.
---
- [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check
this box
---
This PR has been generated by [Mend
Renovate](https://www.mend.io/free-developer-tools/renovate/). View
repository job log
[here](https://developer.mend.io/github/Unleash/unleash).
<!--renovate-debug:eyJjcmVhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiIzNy40MjEuMCIsInVwZGF0ZWRJblZlciI6IjM3LjQyMS4wIiwidGFyZ2V0QnJhbmNoIjoibWFpbiIsImxhYmVscyI6W119-->
Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
PR #7519 introduced the pattern of using `createApiTokenService` instead
of newing it up. This usage was introduced in a concurrent PR (#7503),
so we're just cleaning up and making the usage consistent.
Deletes API tokens bound to specific projects when the last project they're mapped to is deleted.
---------
Co-authored-by: Tymoteusz Czech <2625371+Tymek@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Thomas Heartman <thomas@getunleash.io>
This PR disables the "create feature flag" button when you've reached
the limits.
This one is a little more complex than the other UI limits, because we
also have to take into account the project feature limit. I've tried to
touch as little as possible, but I _have_ extracted the calculation of
both limits into a single hook.
If you have SDK tokens scoped to projects that are deleted, you should
not get access to any flags with those.
---------
Co-authored-by: David Leek <david@getunleash.io>
This change reverts the changes related to the button in particular
that were introduced in #7500. The button is now always enabled, and
the actual resource warning and creation blocking happens in the form,
courtesy of #7548.
Currently, if the location changes, it does not update the active item.
I added useEffect to update the active item.
This is required when the user navigates via the command menu.
This PR adds a feature flag limit to Unleash. It's set up to be
overridden in Enterprise, where we turn the limit up.
I've also fixed a couple bugs in the fake feature flag store.
This adds an extended metrics format to the metrics ingested by Unleash
and sent by running SDKs in the wild. Notably, we don't store this
information anywhere new in this PR, this is just streamed out to
Victoria metrics - the point of this project is insight, not analysis.
Two things to look out for in this PR:
- I've chosen to take extend the registration event and also send that
when we receive metrics. This means that the new data is received on
startup and on heartbeat. This takes us in the direction of collapsing
these two calls into one at a later point
- I've wrapped the existing metrics events in some "type safety", it
ain't much because we have 0 type safety on the event emitter so this
also has some if checks that look funny in TS that actually check if the
data shape is correct. Existing tests that check this are more or less
preserved
This PR activates the limit for API token creation in both the global
API token window and in the project-level API token tab.
Because the same button is used in two places, I encapsulated the
fetching of flags and resource limits within the button. I can be
convinced to pass the current API token count and the limit as
arguments, but I think this is the right solution for this case.
This PR adds the back end for API token resource limits.
It adds the limit to the schema and checks the limit in the service.
## Discussion points
The PAT service uses a different service and different store entirely,
so I have not included testing any edge cases where PATs are included.
However, that could be seen as "knowing too much". We could add tests
that check both of the stores in tandem, but I think it's overkill for
now.
