These are both related to the work on the project list improvements
project.
The `projectListImprovements` flag will be used to enable disable the
new project list improvements.
The `useProjectReadModel` flag will be used to enable/disable the use
of the new project read model and is mostly a safety feature.
Changes the type used by the useEventSearch hook to be `EventSchema`
from OpenAPI instead. This is more accurate with what we're actually
getting. And crucially for the event log search, it contains the
`createdByUserId` property that we need to filter out events.
It's mostly a straightforward find and replace except for one instance
where we need to do some extra fiddling. There's an inline comment
explaining that.
Extracts the Avatar Group component into a `common` component and adds a
standard tooltip to all avatars.
Relates to linear issue 1-2606
This is a suggestion / proof of concept for how we can solve it. While I
think we can merge this as is, I'd also be happy to take any discussions
on other ways to approach it etc.
## Why are these changes made together?
Because extracting the avatar group without adding the new tooltip data
made the existing tooltip misbehave (it'd show up in the top left of the
screen, not synced to the avatar in any way).
I probably could have (and still can if you think it's prudent) split it
out such that the avatar gets a standardized tooltip first (and disable
it for the group card avatars), and split out the avatars in a
follow-up. Happy to do that if you think it's better.
## What does this mean?
It used to be that we had no consistent way of dealing with avatars and
tooltips. Some places had them, some places didn't. This change makes it
so that all avatars that we can show tooltips for will get the same
tooltip.
Previously, we had at least 4 different ways of dealing with tooltips:
- The HTML tooltip (that would be standardized with this PR) in the
project flags table
- The "title" that you'd get on your user avatar
- The group card list tooltip
- And sometimes you'd get nothing at all
with this change, we'll always show the same kind of tooltip if we can:
## What goes in the tooltip?
We use the `UserAvatar` component for a fair few different things and I
didn't want to extract separate components for all the different use
cases. Instead, I wanted to get an overview over what we use it for and
what is relevant info to show.
I found all the places we used it and tried to form an opinion.
This tooltip will work with a user's email, name, username, and id. If
there is no user (such as for empty avatars and avatars displaying only
"+n" for remaining members), we show no tooltip.
Following the example set by the group card avatars, we'll try to use
email or username (in that order) as the main bit of text. If the user
has an email or a username and also a name, the name will be used as
secondary text.
If the user does not have an email or username, but has a name, we'll
use the name as the main text.
If the user does not have an email, a username, or a name, we'll try to
show "User ID: N" if they have an id.
If they do not have a username, a name, an email, or an ID, we bail out
and show nothing.
## Why can you disable the tooltip?
In some cases, you might want to disable the tooltip because you have
more information to feed into it. An example of that is in the project
flags table, where we want to show more information in cases where the
user is 'unknown':
## Additional fixes
This PR also adds a few lines of CSS to fix a minor avatar layout bug.
Before:
After:
This PR adds the UI part of feature flag collaborators. Collaborators are hidden on windows smaller than size XL because we're not sure how to deal with them in those cases yet.
Same as the OIDC changes we merged yesterday, this makes the frontend
ready for disabling SAML configuration page, if the SAML_ environment
variables are set.
---------
Co-authored-by: Nuno Góis <github@nunogois.com>
This PR removes the last two flags related to the project managament
improvements project, making the new project creation form GA.
In doing so, we can also delete the old project creation form (or at
least the page, the form is still in use in the project settings).
This PR removes the flag for the new project card design, making it GA.
It also removes deprecated components and updates one reference (in the
groups card) to the new components instead.
This PR removes all the feature flags related to the project list split
and updates the snapshot.
Now the project list will always contain "my projects" and "other
projects"
This fixes the case when a customer have thousands of strategies causing
the react UI to crash. We still consider it incorrect to use that amount
of strategies and this is more a workaround to help the customer out of
a crashing state.
We put it behind a flag called `manyStrategiesPagination` and plan to
only enable it for the customer in trouble.
Add a flag to enable/disable the new UI for project creation.
This flag is separate from the impl on the back end so that we can
enable one without the other (but uses flag dependencies in Unleash, so
that we can never enable the new UI without the new back end).
I have not set the flag to `true` in server startup because the form
doesn't work yet, so it's a manual step for now.
Converts `newContextFieldUI` release flag to
`disableShowContextFieldSelectionValues` kill switch.
The kill switch controls whether we show the value selection above the
search filed when > 100 values
---------
Signed-off-by: andreas-unleash <andreas@getunleash.ai>
Provides store method for retrieving traffic usage data based on
period parameter, and UI + ui hook with the new chart for displaying
traffic usage data spread out over selectable month.
In this PR we copied and adapted a plugin written by DX for highlighting
a column in the chart:
There are some minor improvements planned which will come in a separate
PR, reversing the order in legend and tooltip so the colors go from
light to dark, and adding a month -sum below the legend
## Discussion points
- Should any of this be extracted as a separate reusable component?
---------
Co-authored-by: Nuno Góis <github@nunogois.com>
In order to prevent users from being able to assign roles/permissions
they don't have, this PR adds a check that the user performing the
action either is Admin, Project owner or has the same role they are
trying to grant/add.
This addAccess method is only used from Enterprise, so there will be a
separate PR there, updating how we return the roles list for a user, so
that our frontend can only present the roles a user is actually allowed
to grant.
This adds the validation to the backend to ensure that even if the
frontend thinks we're allowed to add any role to any user here, the
backend can be smart enough to stop it.
We should still update frontend as well, so that it doesn't look like we
can add roles we won't be allowed to.
## About the changes
This is a rough initial version as a PoC for a permission matrix.
This is only available after enabling the flag `userAccessUIEnabled`
that is set to true by default in local development.
The access was added to the users' admin page but could be embedded in
different contexts (e.g. when assigning a role to a user):
This is how the matrix looks like
---------
Co-authored-by: Nuno Góis <github@nunogois.com>
Only triggers if there is any rows in client instances that have
sdk_version: unleash-edge with version < 17.0.0
The function that checks this memoizes the check for 10 minutes to avoid
scanning the client instances table too often.
This PR will allow us to use a feature flag with variants to control
whether or not we should show the comments field of the feedback form.
This will allow us to see whether we can increase feedback collection if
we reduce the load on the customer.
